What?
I thought planes were flown into some buildings back in Sept. of 2001?
2007-01-29 23:36:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well true Saddam was more a threat to his people then to the united states. To Answer your Question there is no solution to Iraq it will always be under attack. The Government in Iraq needs to be strong. Saddam kept his country under certain restrictions so that the sunnis & shites wouldn't clash. Now that he is Dead the country is under extreme choas, making it a democracy was a bad idea we should of left it the way it was a communist nation. Terrorists(Mostly Shites & Muslims) have infiltrated Iraq and now Iran has a plan to bring it's fighters to Iraq to help the shites that are being attack by united states. The only way I see Iraq changing is if you bring in a strong enough leader like Saddam. This war will go on for centuries unless we find a strong leader.
2007-01-30 08:09:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't let anyone fool you here. Of course they "care" what you think. Otherwise they wouldn't be here answering and asking questions. It's really sad how many people STILL believe Iraq had something to do with 911. In fact its pathetic. And yes the situation is getting worse and yes Bush and his cronies were the 'aggressors' and yes Bush and cronies had thousands of US troops poised to protect the Iraqi oil wells well before the invasion and ultimate occupation even got under way. Just as thousands of contractors and support staff had already planned to 'occupy' the Green Zone long before the war began.
2007-01-30 07:46:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
The end of the war in Iraq?
Obviously the situation there is getting worse since Bush chose to send more troops
Yes we lost 2 men and a helicopter. This resulted from a dual effort between the Iraqi's and US soldiers that killed 250 insurgents.
So what the *** are you talking about?
2007-01-30 07:49:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
End of OIL in Iraq = End of War in Iraq !
Has the above stated thing happened? NO. So, the war in Iraq wont end for, say next 5-6 yrs (Psst, by then US would have shipped most of the reserves to their homeland or some secret CIA location).
2007-01-30 07:58:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cristiano R 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The end of the war in Iraq I hope it would be today!
I against wars whatsoever!
Because basically America is a total paradox ever exist to every human life. America is a volatile place right now... Sorry to say. From there comes all the greatness of life, but also derives all the dreadful lifestyle...
Since America ages only more less 600 years old, so America is considered as one of the youngest countries in the world.
Yes America helped and helps for many positive humanitarian things in this world. America do have such a big contribution to this world, but at the same time America also really display and portray how shameful, horrendous, shallow and wicked they are towards many things in this life. America creates order BUT also chaos at the same time...
They make not only fantastic war movies but also make the REAL wars in reality.... and they do enjoy wars like playing playstation. They are full of hope, chance and greatness but they are also full of hatred, anger, wickednesses and hang ups. American lives their life in such a spectacular way compare to other countries on this planet. But at the same time American do live in such a tiny bubble and fuzzy dreams ever.
America is the chaos and the order at the same time-. America not only makes great creations to the world but also painful and traumatic destructions emotionally or physically..... for sure.
2007-01-30 07:36:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Im an American Arab.. I dont however think the general public "American" started the war, or wanted a war.. Its Bush.. him and his money hungry CEO friends.. Wars bring money.. You know Halliburton and some other huge contractors were having board meetings bidding on who was going to get the big contracts in Iraq even before Bush sent the first soldier in... Its all business.. Sad but true.. and when Iraq wears out its function,, someone else is next.. Either Iran, or probably SaudiArabia..
2007-01-30 07:36:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mintee 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
So you are pretty much justifying Saddam's actions of killing hundreds of thousands of his own people and leaving his country in splinters from a sectarian standpoint. You said pretty much that he was an innocent man. He was a brutal dictator, who squelched resistance with no mercy, and who disallowed any differing opinion on everything. One example is in one of his ministers' meetings he asked a minister his opinion on whether or not Saddam should end the war with Iran. The minister said, "yes". Saddam abruptly unholstered his gun and shot the man in the head. Then he ordered the body chopped up in to bits, placed in a chest, and then delivered to his wife and children. His son Uday used a political prisoner's toes and fingers as fishbait. I do believe the US should now leave. Iraq has to end their own cycles of violence against one another, end their own religious civil war, and use their own oil revenues to rebuild their infrastructure. But, you are wrong. Saddam deserves his place in history next to Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin & Mao tse-tung.
2007-01-30 07:43:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by gone 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why do you european/canadian white trash idiots keep on your site? This is Yahoo! answers for US english, ok? It's pretty obviously that you arent an american, so who cares what your opinions are about US foreign policy? you people are such pathetic losers. it's no wonder that the only people that want to live in your country are dirty muslims.
2007-01-30 08:08:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Matt 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
What's sad is your ignorance. Open your eyes.
2007-01-30 07:40:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋