Clinton as our leader, the President of the United States of America?
2007-01-29 22:20:21 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Obviously Joe Smow is either Hillary Clinton in disguise or has been the the cave. Maybe probably has been in prison and has no access to TV, internet or media to hear what Hillary has been up to.
2007-01-29 22:43:35 · update #1
Obviously Joe Smow is either Hillary Clinton in disguise or has been the the cave. Maybe probably has been in prison and has no access to TV, internet or media to hear what Hillary has been up to.
2007-01-29 22:43:36 · update #2
Hillary is just as bad if not worse than John Kerry..,she changes her story repeatedly about her position on the war..,and even more so now so she can get votes.I guess she is basically calling her followers stupid thinking they forgot what she voted for.
2007-01-29 22:25:00 · answer #1 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
We did it for the last two elections, why stop now? Or is mudslinging the sole privilidge of the GOP?
http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/feature/2000/11/14/sc_pols/index.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views/022100-106.htm
And with all the vile names you call someone who has done nothing to you but threatened to show you she can maybe do a better job than the President you picked twice, you are obviously not above being a mud-slinging, badmouthing, classless person youself.
So why should anyone take you seriously?
2007-01-30 00:39:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Seems like the Bush campaign did a real job on McCain in the primaries before Bush's first term - there has been plenty of classless mud slinging to go around for years now. Rove perfected the "big lie" in campaigining. So why are you picking on Clinton exactly? We haven't had an honorable person up for that office in years.
2007-01-29 23:49:15 · answer #3 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Seems like you've got your accusations bass ackwards. Hillary is on the receiving end of the mudslinging, badmouthing classless bashing from the right. She's tired of being the target of baseless lies and is letting it be known that she'll fight back. That shows class, I like that a lot more then I do the senseless lockstep marching of the Bushbots. Lets face it, the name Clinton simply inspires the deepest hatred ever seen in the minds of Bushbots, they see a deep dark red and all of it's due to the constant brainwashing of the RNC, Bush, Rove, Limbo ugh and Coulter. It's a pity that people in the Republican party can do no better than to follow their leadership, sorry as it is.
2007-01-29 22:43:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
the two way that's difficult, yet with this years applicants all being vulnerable and not a real frontrunner in the blend it is up for grabs. u.s. often is the real sufferer of this election could the applicants no longer do what they promise as prevalent. ok now to respond to your question(sorry) the female has it greater durable because of the fact she is considered as vulnerable and sympathetic the place a black guy together as considered as no longer so sturdy of politics and or his loss of experience will nonetheless be sturdy sufficient to command the wonderful usa in the international. And no i dont help Obama, particularly because of the fact i think of.... nicely ill bypass away this on my own
2016-11-23 13:43:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We definitely do not need another Clinton in the White House!!!! People should have learned their lesson when the other Clinton was in office!! She lied to cover up the legal problems they were having in Arkansas, she lied to cover for Bill & Monica & she lied about her positon on the war etc... She definitely does not have class!!!!!
2007-01-30 00:39:17 · answer #6 · answered by d3midway semi-retired 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We have one or another mud-slinging, badmouthing, classless person in the white house since 1981.
But no, I'm not in favour of Hillary.
2007-01-29 22:45:19 · answer #7 · answered by sudonym x 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Iran,,,will set the measure higher than Hillary can bad mouth into....by 2008 i predict,,,republican warrior victory as ,,,all America festers with war and death,,,no time for peace or Hillary,,,,something new to the plate by then...civilian
2007-01-29 22:41:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton happens to have a good, strong head on her shoulders. I think politics always involve some amount of mud-slinging no matter who is running. You probably didn't mind it when it was just men running for the Presidency. Hillary Clinton actually cares about what people need and isn't just trying to further personal agendas like someone we know in the Oval office...
2007-01-29 22:24:42 · answer #9 · answered by Cute But Evil 5 · 3⤊ 6⤋
The answer to that won't be known until 2008.
2007-01-29 22:27:08 · answer #10 · answered by Slug 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋