...or will he be continually protected by the British State and his cronies?
2007-01-29 21:49:50 · 15 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Highly unlikely. Bush is probably putting pressure on everyone to protect him.
2007-01-29 21:54:45 · answer #1 · answered by DAVE 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No, because he commited no war crimes as did the USA. The USA was attacked first and they only defended themselves. You people really need to understand the reasons behind warfare. WE did not start the war they did by bombing the twin towns, the Pentagon and almost the white house. God bless the poor innocent souls those muslim terriorist killed on flight 93.
If we didn't show that we were a strong nation we would be living back in the stone age again because they would come over here and bomb us all. People say pull out now, well if we did then that would send a message to the insurgents that the USA was running away and they would chase after us and kill us.
How more simply put can I make it? I hate the war. I lost two very good friends killed doing something kind for an Iraqi family and one severely injured giving out candy to children and the insurgents killed the children to get at the troop. What kind of people are we dealing with who kill innocent children just to get at a troop?
Look, War is nast, dirty and not a good thing but then there are some people who are too and we can't let them gain a foothold anywhere. Americans are bad, ok, so we want to feed the starving, house the homeless, heal the sick and give clothes to the poor, so we send aid to countries who really need a helping hand: But there is a good many of us who are good people.
Tony Blair is just doing what he thinks is right to save England and that's such a bad thing. He should let insurgents come and decapitate innocent people and blow their homes up. My lord, what was he thinking? A safe England? Should he give England to the insurgents?
2007-01-29 22:13:28 · answer #2 · answered by greylady 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why should he be on trial? Many countries agreed with Mr. Blair and the President about the weapons of mass destruction. I have always felt that Sudan moved those weapons to Sierra. Whether they were correct or not history will give the final answer.
2007-01-29 22:03:26 · answer #3 · answered by Diane H 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The UK will follow the line first put forward by the US, this is that answering any questions could jeopardise national security. This means if we ask His Tonyness to explain himself then all the baddies will learn our secrets and be able to topple our once great country. So don't ask or you could be branded as unpatriotic and all bad things in the world will be on your doorstep. As both George and Tony are religious I beleive they learnt this mantra from having faith and not questioning it.
2007-01-29 22:09:41 · answer #4 · answered by Reg Tedious 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To hell with Iraq, I want him to face up and stand trial for letting down the BRITISH PEOPLE - for squandering God knows how much of our Tax Money on this war when there are Brits in need of homes, jobs and healthcare!!!! Thats a dereliction of his duty. He was elected to look after the British people not to take their money and waste it whilst ignoring their needs!!!
2007-01-30 06:25:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO... England sanctioned teh war with with iraq... as far as were concerned its a legitimate engagement.
and..just for the record, what war crimes are these? you have allegations raise them at the hague, not here...
and not only will he (blair) be protected, he wil have our unwaveriing support. mind you, this is democracy in action... and you wouldnt understand the concept would you.
you dont like the war or our politics, then you know where the door is... use it and shut it behind you...
2007-01-29 22:02:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I would say no.
Do you think that the Arab nations will ever be forced to adopt basic human rights, treat women as equals and denounce violence against all peoples including Jews?
never mind, it's a rhetorical question, and i think the absurdity of your questions gives me the answer.
2007-01-29 22:05:00 · answer #7 · answered by Malikail 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The truth like it or not, is there are no war crimes!
The UN decree was being enforced
2007-01-29 22:39:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It seems pretty unlikely he will face trial but we can hope that he gets what he deserves!
2007-01-30 09:35:14 · answer #9 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He'll get away scott free, very rich and smugger than ever.
2007-02-02 09:50:33 · answer #10 · answered by chewystuff 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋