English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-29 20:44:36 · 8 answers · asked by aliengirl 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

8 answers

80% of humanity, the religious folks, don't need to ask the meaning of life, the church tells them....the supernatural explanation. But the rest of us can't swallow religious dogma, because there's no evidence. Nobody can prove that there life after death, that people are tortured or rewarded after life or that there's invisible spirits running around.

I've come to two conclusions recently:

1. Life has no meaning
2. Life has a million meanings.

First, there's a certainty that death and annihilation awaits not only you, but the Earth in general. It's an astonomical certainty that our sun will supernova and leave the earth a burnt crisp, not to mention all the other extinction level events around the corner.

Second, the million things that give us meaning are the pleasurable experiences we can conjure up during the short period we are here on the earth, in the form of the relationships we have with our kids and other people, and the 'housekeeping' types of purposes. What i mean by that are the curing disease, ending hunger, improving literacy, reducing crime, preventing war, helping other kinds of things.

So the bottom line is, we only have a temporary meaning to life, to reduce pain and increase pleasure, other than that everything is lost to oblivion.


To be or not to be? "To be" is temporary and "not to be" is inevitable.....

2007-01-30 08:53:21 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

Gee, that's a good question. I will have to think about it.

2007-01-30 05:23:11 · answer #2 · answered by sudonym x 6 · 0 0

To be. You're more likely to regret what you didn't do on your deathbed than what you did do.

2007-01-30 04:48:13 · answer #3 · answered by flygirl 3 · 0 0

Decidedly to be.

2007-01-30 04:49:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well...you have to "be" before you can "not be", so I suppose the answer is "TO BE"!

2007-01-30 04:51:52 · answer #5 · answered by iNeviTable fuTure 2 · 0 0

that is the question

2007-01-30 04:51:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not to be.

2007-01-30 05:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by I love you too! 6 · 0 0

..that is the question

2007-01-30 04:51:41 · answer #8 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers