2007-01-29 20:07:14 · 21 answers · asked by marc l 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I don't believe in capital punishment so I don't wish Bush the same fate though he is probably a far bigger criminal than Saddam.
2007-01-30 03:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by peace m 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Careful...we had a local 81 year old man who wrote a letter similar to this question to the editor of a small town newspaper,didn't even name the person he was suggesting get the same fate as Saddam.He got a visit from the Secret service,along with those who responded favorably to his suggestion.It is very easy for the government to track down those on the internet that are threatening the life of the President.
2007-01-30 00:29:32 · answer #2 · answered by mizzjerry 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he should.... He doesn't know what forgiveness and love are... all he knows is hatred and pride!
Hmmm... by killing George W Bush.. for sure. But basically America is a volatile place right now. From there comes all the greatness of life, but also derives all the dreadful lifestyle... Since America ages only more less 600 years old, so America is considered as one of the youngest country in the world. Yes America helped and helps many thing in this world. America has the big contribution to this world, but at the same time America also really display and portray how shameful, horrendous and wicked they are towards many things in this life. America creates order BUT also chaos at the same time...
They make not only fantastic war movies but also make the REAL wars in reality.... and they do enjoy wars like playing playstation. They are full of hope but they are also full of hatred, anger and hang ups.
America is the chaos and the order at the same time-. America creates creation to the world but also destruction.... for sure.
2007-01-29 23:01:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Saddam wasn't "renditioned" to secret prisons and tortured. We'll reserve that for war criminals worse than Hussein.
Saddam killed 300,000 and Chicken George has killed over 650,000.
Additional:
To "jon-jon h": If you're so manly, why are you hiding behind your computer instead of enlisting for deployment in Iraq? A big, tough man wouldn't be afraid of entering war and combat, but you seem to be.
To "fate_n83":
Clearly, you don't understand the basics of law. Suggesting that someone should be tried and convicted of their crimes is not advocating murder, even when the obvious sentence for such crimes is execution. And given that Bu**sh** was advocating the murder of people in other countries - bombing Al Jazeera in Qatar, the "Salvador option" (murder) of Chavez, etc. - it's ludicrous and hypocritical to suggest that the same procedures used on Saddam should not be applied to Chicken George and others in the Whorehouse.
Two years ago, Sergio Berlusconi tried to make it illegal for anyone to prosecute him for crimes committed while in office, after he left or was voted out. (While he was prime minister, he was immune to prosecution.) Everyone knew Berlusconi was involved in illegal deals and bribery; should he be protected from jail time after he leaves office? If you say no, then why are you advocating that Chicken George be exempt from something far more serious: war crimes and crimes against humanity?
.
2007-01-29 22:10:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How many US soldiers have been killed so far? What about the
soldiers he had sent while he made plans for the Super-Bowl?
I don't see any difference between the two so yes Hang Him!
Sadaam killed so he was then hung. Bush has killed almost as
many so why isn't he swinging from a rope? There is going to have to be some major changes before we start another war
right here, right now! As far as being careful, I have rights just
like everyone else here. One happens to be the Freedom of Speech! I am not making any kind of threat, I am letting my
opinion of our "great leader" be heard!!!
2007-01-30 00:48:31 · answer #5 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
a million. look up the observe "systematically" interior the dictionary. 2. study the version between mendacity and asserting something that one believes to be real that isn't be real. 3. to respond to your question.....No. in my opinion, it is an absurd and ignorant question. do no longer enable politics blind you....the guy leaves plenty to be needed in a president, yet he's no longer a ruthless tyrant...in basic terms a president attempting to do something to alter the international for the extra advantageous. regrettably people such as you do no longer understand what's we are doing in Iraq and why it has each little thing to do with combating terrorism and little to do with WMD's. The terrorists understand, the Democrats pretend they do no longer, and maximum individuals do no longer. Please open up your recommendations, take off the dislike glasses, show your self and medical care your self of lack of know-how.
2016-12-16 16:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by allateef 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he deserves the same fate as Saddam. Even though he has made some poor decisions.
2007-01-29 21:17:03 · answer #7 · answered by skii21 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
George Bush doesn't deserve Saddam's fate, he deserves much worse fate....
bear in mind the following:
1) Bush killed and is kiling his soldiers for the sake of Oil, Saddam never did that.
1) Bush killed and is killing his ppl, as a result of his stupid foreign policy "last event happened in Greece", Saddam have never done that.
3) Bush killed and is killing inoocent ppl/civilians from other nationality Saddam did that only when declared war against Iran, and he even didn't killed civilian he only killed soldiers.
4) Saddam killed his own ppl "at Al-Anfal" and he declared responsiblity of it, Bush killed "or at least accepted the killing of them" on 9-11 and he is lieing and he is been blaming it on other ppl..
so for God's sake who deserves to be punished?? Saddam or Bush??
2007-01-29 20:51:21 · answer #8 · answered by Skimmer 2 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Yes he is. And Saddam should have been granted amnesty, for turning his country from an underdeveloped fanatic Islamic one into a modern & moderate state, as well as for standing against imperialistic aggression.
2007-01-29 20:47:00 · answer #9 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
YES
count the number of Iraqis who died during Saddam's rule and count the ones who died under the US lead occupation. make a comparison and put in mind the duration of Saddam's rule and the few years of the American invasion of Iraq. do the math and see what you get.
operation Iraqi freedom my ***. thousands are dying every day just so bush can get his hands on the oil.
2007-01-29 20:26:29 · answer #10 · answered by fate_n83 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋