English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

None of them...face it is America really ready for a woman President or a black one. I mean it's sad that we are not ready yet, but I have to look at it this way. A female President is she willing to go to war if the time comes, is she willing to sent military personal to their deaths.

Second a black President would get so many death threats, he probably would get so many attempts of assassination it would be an open season. Plus there alot of groups who have alot of power that would not allow that. Also he lacks the experience to be President or even come close.

Third I think a President should have some kind of military background.. Every President of the US had a military background except for Clinton.

2007-01-29 19:16:27 · answer #1 · answered by captstevenfusmc 2 · 2 1

probable no longer, yet whilst they do count selection Florida and Michigan votes she will probable win the conventional vote. additionally, the great delegates will seem at particular swing states. Obama's numbers in Florida and Ohio are no longer almost as good as Clintons' and Democrats want a sort of two states come the final election. Hillary all in all (state to state) does have a greater valuable threat of thrashing McCain than Obama. i've got executed the mathematics. for this reason as a Republican, i could quite see Obama get the nod, so McCain often is the subsequent president.

2016-11-23 13:35:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

wow nice names there. Well I think america has already voted for a change when america gave dems the seats in congress... so why wouldnt america be ready for a change because it seems as the white men does not do a good job... Bush only has 39% of voters who back him which makes him the 3rd worse president in US history. It would be nice to have either a woman president or a black president. (oh and btw I am white). But I feel like hillary will have the better chance. which either one would be good imo IF they are the best ones for the position. If not then they do not need it. I guess we will see who does what and stands for what in the next months and year...

2007-01-29 20:04:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I wonder if you might be biased ?..... LOL. Anyway , Iwould expect it to be Hitlery Clinton vs. John Mc Cain in 2008. look for Obama or Biden , or Gulianini or Romney as undercards.

2007-01-29 19:11:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Hilary vs. Guiliani or Brownback. Guiliani has just as many skeletons in his closet as Hilary and he has a tendancy to slienate both parties on certain issues.

2007-01-29 19:13:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hard question... if it were just the two of them I would have to go with Hillary, only because she has more experience... but I do like him also...... but let us not count out Edwards just yet... Who knows?

2007-01-29 20:48:17 · answer #6 · answered by Debra H 7 · 0 0

Bright chances are for Hillary.

2007-01-29 19:10:49 · answer #7 · answered by saudikashroff 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers