The chicken of course (because the egg comes from the chicken)
2007-01-29 18:36:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by flower_from_the_heavens 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I say it was the egg. The "first chicken" (the first member of the species we call chicken, having whatever characteristics distinguish a chicken from its ancestor species) was likely to be the result of recombination of the genes of two ancestral near-chickens, or some kind of mutant (this depends on how we define the difference between a chicken and a chicken-ancestor) that made it a "chicken." It hatched from an egg that must have been a chicken egg, that was laid by a non-chicken. It mated with a non-chicken and laid another chicken egg. Something like that - but if the chicken came first, then you would have to have a chicken hatching from a non-chicken egg somewhere, which is categorically not possible. blah blah blah! It's purely a question of defining terms a certain way, not a real puzzle.
2007-01-29 19:15:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by zilmag 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A. Enough with the Creationist B.S.
B. To answer the question, it is a difficult process of biological identification and even semantics. If a pre-chicken laid an egg that became the first chicken, one would be inclined to say the chicken came first. However, since a chicken hatched from that egg, would it technically be a chicken egg? I would think that an egg is defined by what comes from it, thereby the first true chicken would have to have come from the first chicken egg.
2007-01-29 18:49:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Link 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
My answer would be the chicken first. Because if egg comes first it would not hatch,since no chickens are gonna lay it. Also, you need a chicken to get an egg.
2007-01-29 18:37:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by FloralLover 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The chicken came first. The chicken egg can't lay an egg.
2007-01-29 18:33:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Agent319.007 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Chicken egg. Even though humans arent hatched, babies start as the female egg before they are fertilized with a sperm. The chicken embreyo is contained inside the egg.
but seriously.. who knows? we might as well say which came first.. dinosaurs or dinosaur eggs?
2007-01-30 12:43:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sore wa himitsu desu! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible says Adam named all the animals so I believe the chicken came 1st.
2007-01-29 18:34:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kelly M 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
You know that's an age old QUESTION? ITS the chicken. G-d created the animals. HE never mentioned the egg.
2007-01-29 18:41:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That would depend on whether you are a creationist or an evolutionist, as a creationist I believe the chicken was first. God said let there be chicken, and there they were, and if cooked right they are GOOD!!!
2007-01-29 18:41:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋