http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070129/ap_on_go_co/pelosi_bloggers_3
2007-01-29 17:50:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah, a little.
You've got to remember, reporters write stories, editors approve them.
Reporters and editors are humans.
Humans are biased.
2007-01-29 17:53:49 · answer #1 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When morality comes up against profit to someones gain , it is seldom that profit loses. We can see here that she sees this as a way to gain her goal. I am sure she sees this as nothing wrong but a means to her goal. Is it bias or ethical you might ask, no more than newspapers and radio and talks that do the same within their means. So I guess my view is yes it is. I don't care for this anymore than I care for lying or slanting on TV, newspapers or radio.
Look at the facts of the world --it happens all the time in many ways.
I feel, we are here on earth to do good -to be the best you can be (a life long project). What the others are here for, I don't know. It appears with many-anything goes if it gets them what THEY want.
Interesting question and post very thought provoking, I do think many more will use this tool in the future. How people view it will vary depending on their own ethics. As well as how they will use it, will too be based on their own ethics and morals.
2007-01-30 02:23:21 · answer #2 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
from the link alone, "yahoo news" I say yes.
---
After reading it, i don't think the story itself is too bias, but her actions were. Why weren't any right wing bloggers invited, or allowed?
2007-01-30 01:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
sorry, I don't see any bias, after all it says Republicans are using blogs as well.
2007-01-30 02:44:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a little anti-Lieberman
2007-01-30 02:00:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a puff piece.
2007-01-30 01:57:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋