Rudy. The man has shown he can handle a crisis situation with grace and class, something that no one else can say they did during and after 9/11.
Hillary has at least 40% of the people in this country who will never vote for her, and just as we didn't need a Bush dynasty, we don't need a Clinton one either. Obama is not known well-enough nationwide to win.
2007-01-30 00:38:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If people would look past Guliani's stance before 9/11 and his heroism; they would remember a bullying Mayor who never once stood up to protect the Minority population from Police excess in a couple of really High Profile Police shootings against innocent Black Men. He likes to take credit for the drop in crime wave during his tenure; but the truth was crime dropped Nationwide. So was that just a fluke. And his relationshipwith Bernard Kerrick. I was so proud of him becayse he was raied in my home town, Truth be as anOfficer for the County of Passaic he was a punk. I guess he never did outgrow it.
Obama has wonderful ideas but no record. And without the experience and savvy a more Professional Politician has he will be eaten alive.
The answer is the talanted Hilary Clinton. She has experience she has guts and savy. She also has a Husband that is very well loved around the World.We will need to seek much healing with our allies and everyone else in the World. Bill should be Secretary of State.
Guliani will never be excepted by the Religious right for his more liberal stances on Social Issues. He would have been smarter to cross over. However his running of the City of New York was bullish and as the Idiot in the White House now things are only his way or no way.
Obama will be a great candidate in the future. He has do something first. Philospy does not flywhen you want to get things done. {JFK for exampple} . You have to know how to sell your initiatives to the wolves. You have to be a hard biting Politician.
2007-01-30 08:15:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
President Obama? no,,, President Guiliani eh no,,, President Clinton,,,she's got to explain if she had an affair with Vince Foster who allegedly killed himself under unusual circumstances.
She wants to be the Pres. then open up and stop hiding things from the public. none of the above
2007-01-30 02:54:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ugh, I'm personally not rooting for any of them but I'd have to say Obama. Clinton turns me off because of her flimsy stances on the issues, I don't believe Giuliani has what it takes to be president (Very iffy on his stances as a Republican, and his family values), but we have yet to see what Obama will do next. Perhaps John McCain will get my vote in 08.
2007-01-30 01:26:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Small Elephant 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bill Clinton!
Because Guiliani is not qualified to be president.
2007-01-30 01:19:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Of those you listed, Guilliani. But I think that John Edwards will actually be the next person elected.
2007-01-30 01:25:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeremy C 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Obama! He's too new to be as crooked as the rest, Giuliani is a complete moron, ask most New Yorkers.
2007-01-30 01:26:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by columind99 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I want to see Guiliani's platform and if he and McCain will team up
2007-01-30 01:21:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Clinton, like her views
2007-01-30 01:22:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by singledad 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Have any of these candidates been generals in the U.S. Military? Find me two and call me in the morning.
2007-01-30 01:33:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by AmandaHugNKiss 4
·
0⤊
1⤋