I hope
2007-01-29 16:09:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I thought the winner of the Royal Rumble gets a 1 on 1 shot against the champion of his choice. So, why would there be a Triple Threat Match. If there's a Triple Threat Match, makes the Undertaker's victory at the RR seem like it meant nothing. What's the point of winning the RR if the Undertaker doesn't get a 1 on 1 match against the champion.
2007-01-30 02:00:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I reckon it'll be Taker vs. Batista (if Taker loses that'll be me done with wwe) and HBK vs Cena vs Orton
2007-01-30 00:12:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd rather watch Batista vs. Taker because Taker never lost at WM and batista never lost a single match..........Or even Lashley vs. Taker
2007-01-30 00:10:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by udontcea 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is exactly what is going to happen! It is the hot new rumor out there inn the back of WWE lockeroom!! That leaves Batista vs. Kane at WM 23 which has also been getting lots of things going backstage!!!!! Or, Batista/Lashley like originally planned!!!!! Stay tuned!!!!
2007-01-30 00:38:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by TooFly 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Either way, HBK needs to get into the main event in order to truly make it interesting.
2007-01-30 09:14:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by RichMac82 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no! It will be 'Taker vs. Batista and HBK vs. Cena
2007-01-30 08:50:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Arnold 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if you just saw the undertake pop us on RAW I would saw that/ Gez
Cena has two tiltle still looking good
2007-01-30 00:18:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by path2631 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No i rather see undertaker whoop cenas ***. i wonder if hes there to stay on raw. or if hes making a suprise visit.
2007-01-30 00:32:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is going to be the undertaker vs batista
2007-01-30 16:13:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by jamaican babe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋