English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I hear they're going to shoot the last two films in New Zealand to save money. The films gross $900 mil a piece as it is... how much money do they really need to save, and why start now? Also i hear Emma Watson might not sign on for the last two. I think she's just holding out for more cash.. but if she doesn't do them, will it even be worth making them?

2007-01-29 15:02:53 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Movies

9 answers

Bullocks to the first bit. As for Emma, she may be bargaining, but she is young and bright enough to be restless with the length of the committment.

I think that if she doesn't do the last two it will be a major disappointment to me, but I will still want the movies made.

I also don't really think that she will give up finishing what she started.

She can do other things when she is finished. Right>?

2007-01-29 17:35:29 · answer #1 · answered by beaton_tlc 2 · 0 0

emma has been saying that the last 2 yrs, she would be stupid at this point to walk away. it doesnt matter why they are saving money, its their business ya know. Just lets get them made and I cant wait til july for the last book!@

2007-01-29 15:08:45 · answer #2 · answered by BoTToms UP 5 · 0 0

As long as Rupert Grint plays Ron Weasley and Robbie Coltrane plays Hagrid, I think everything will be OK.

2007-01-29 15:09:30 · answer #3 · answered by Chris 4 · 0 0

Remember 2 characters are going to die in the last book. And The only person who knows is JKR and she is not telling anybody. the question is who are the 2 character that are going to die and how are the directors going to explain it in the movie.

2007-01-29 20:21:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think they are getting too old to play them but I hate when they change them. But I think they should make them no matter if she signs or not.

2007-01-29 15:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Doug R 2 · 0 0

They can save money by taking on new actors, that way they would have to pay them less.

2007-01-29 17:38:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It all depends on the screenplay and director

2007-01-29 15:07:18 · answer #7 · answered by sunback2002 2 · 1 0

idk what they'll do without her it wont be the same hopefully thats a rumor but i also heard that tom felton...for those of you who arent bg fans hes malfoy...isnt going to be in the last 2 either...he plays a big part in the 6th book so idk what they'll do about that?

2007-01-29 15:16:36 · answer #8 · answered by latata2009 2 · 0 0

harry potter SUCKS ALL THE WAY MAN!!!!! get a life!

2007-01-29 15:07:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers