I stumbled on to an article explaining that cognitive skills are skills requiring thinking, problem solving, etc. and "metacognitive" skills are skills involved in evaluating cognitive skills. So assembling a jigsaw puzzle might be a congnitive but judging how good someone is at assembling jigsaw puzzles is a metacognitive skill.
The author's point was that there is a high correlation betwnn cognitive skills and metacognitive skills.
What this means is that people are not good at something are also not very good at realizing that they are not very good at it. This means that relying on anyone's self-evaluation of their skills is a big mistake. Suppose there's some skill that could be rated 0 to 100. If someone is a 90 they will probably accurately assess their self as a 90, but if someone is 40 they might assess their self as a 90. So when you see a self-assessment of 90 it tells you nothing.
Thoughts?
2007-01-29
15:02:13
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology