English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-29 13:22:19 · 7 answers · asked by zeepogee 3 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

17....What about the 30,000 fellow Indians who were slaughtered by the Hurons? The constant killing of Indians by Indians long before the white man came.

2007-01-29 13:52:58 · update #1

7 answers

That all the nations of Native Americans if not most have lost great numbers of the population due to the destruction and killings of my people by the hand of the white man and the coming of the New World.We have been forced onto reservations far from civilization and many have lost or do not know their direct line of ancestry to their people.

2007-01-29 13:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by 17-4serendipity 3 · 1 1

genocide murder.

To Dimples above: get your 'facts' straight.

The dates u give in YOUR account about anthropology are all wrong. Way off!

Slavery didn't exist in the U.S. for 300 years. There was NO U.S.A. 300 years ago. France had colonies in eastern canada. Also Louisiana. England had 13 colonies here. Spain had colonies in what we NOW call Florida, Mexico, & California. The Dutch (from Holland) started a colony here even before England got here-it was called New Amsterdam and England took it from them.

All of these countries at any time were ready to go to war just to obtain more american land.

This land did not become a country, did not become united until 1776 - the start of the American Revolutionary War.

Slavery only existed here in this country for 87 years. It ended in 1863 with Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. DO THE MATH.

1863-1776=87 years!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-01-29 15:21:17 · answer #2 · answered by antonio bigfish baccala 3 · 0 1

Throughout the entire earth, there exist what should truly be regarded as races,1.Humans 2.Apes 3. monkeys 4.baboons the so called "races" of man was not an issue when "MANKIND" were created in Africa.
Being truth that all mankind emerged from this same stock of homo-saipien 150,000 yrs bc in Kenya Africa, and today exist every one of us in different lands due to migrations of one people whom changed cosmetic forms due to envinronment/climate changes,(Other parts of africa 100,000bc Aisia minor 80,000bc Europe 50,000bc,Austrailia30,000bc) it was modern Europe whom seem to admire a rulership status of the world of hue-men. I'm not racist, just relating mere facts to the table before answering this complex question,

So now to the question, i think the trans atlantic African slave trade (unrestituted Holocost)was the worst any "RACE"(the human race) can have possibly ever in past or future have done to another of the same stock.
This, I'm talking 300 odd yrs worth of dehumanizing a peoples and blaming god, I'm not talking 1930s to 1940s as the ashkanazi white jews(whom was restituted by the usa that did not enslave them), nor do i defame the indians whom also becouse of color were dehumanized yet later restituted, I'm talking a peoples that by the book are actually still slaves due to no clear letter saying YOU ARE FREE to travel, buy, sell, trade, reeducate about legacies prior to slavory to enable them to choose at free will(this require same services as Iraqis),
[research restitution,Reparations]
Not Emancipation which is actually a temp for indentured and sharecropping services which today cause blacks to be the roots of all ghettos paying rent all their lives with minimum wage conversion scheems of the wilie lynch typed systems.
My father tells me of his father and he on a feild working awful,
treated o so awful when he was little,
This was not long ago folks!!
and I can see the repecusions of not getting liberated as a peoples......
This is not hate, this is food for the sole of all mankind to relate to truth wherever it stands no matter if you are of any stock of mankind.

2007-01-29 14:49:21 · answer #3 · answered by Dimples 6 · 0 1

In defence of Queen Dimples above;

I clearly read Dimples artical and find it very understandable,
She has no mention of America's date of importing slaves for you to poorly argue against,she just says Europe's involvment.....

Here,, let me better sum it up fellow..................


The Portuguese were particularly keen to explore Africa for wealth and material gain; at the same time they had started up colonies in the Americas, and needed labour to work on plantations there. In the 1440's Africans were captured and taken to Portugal.

Fifty two years later in 1492 the Italian adventurer Christopher Columbus(pirate) made the first of his visits to the Caribbean, arriving somewhere near the Bahamas. His aim was to gain wealth for himself and his patrons, Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain. In 1518 the first slaves were dispatched across the Atlantic.
Soon Britain, the Netherlands and France were competing with Spain and Portugal for a share of the profits of slavery. This new transatlantic slave trade was very different from the kind of slavery that had existed before.
SCALE OF TRADE
The sheer number of slaves taken was unprecedented. The large scale of trading destabilised the social and economic order. By the end of the 18th century one historian estimates 70,000 people a "YEAR" were captured and taken against their will to the Americas. What is now Angola was reduced in parts to a wasteland. In total, at least 12 million Africans were forcibly removed from the continent.
COMMERCIAL FORCES
The Atlantic slave trade was shaped and driven by commercial forces of profit and new patterns of consumption. In the past, slavery had a social and cultural context, rooted in kingship, which imposed definition and restraints on the slave master relationship. In the 15th century the chief goal was profit. Conditions for slaves were very harsh.

Yes it still remains the worst treatment amongst all men starting with dehumanization ideas by Europe!
2007-1440= approximately 567 years ago.....
thanks for doing the math now you can subtract all the years from america or anywhere else's envolvment,but what dimples clearly was saying is these figures SIR.

2007-01-29 15:44:50 · answer #4 · answered by Brian S 1 · 1 1

I have to say both things are horrible. Genocide murder against your race seems far worst.

2007-01-29 14:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Gee-Gee 5 · 0 0

genocide

2007-01-29 13:30:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

genocide

2007-01-29 13:30:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers