sit down and "dialogue" with those who have serious questions about her liberal views and near-Marxist ideas on governance?
Or do you think she will only continue to answer fluff, softball questions from those who support her anyway?
2007-01-29 10:29:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hello Netta Hello!! The question was not about Bush. The question was about Clinton. How does your mindless, hateful rant answer the question?
2007-01-29 11:00:56 · update #1
Good point.
Her way of talking is typical.
#1. Act nice
#2. Complain
#3. Point fingers
#4. Pout
#5. Blame the voters
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-01-29 10:36:35 · answer #1 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This female has already been offered and offered. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the journey, in the militia or intelligence sectors of our government to be helpful in a time as quickly as we are scuffling with a conflict oversees and undertaking a broader “conflict” on terrorism. many times, this does not be an impediment...there have been many sturdy Presidents, without extreme militia credentials –– her husband being considered one of them. inspite of the incontrovertible fact that, with a view to rectify the quagmire that Bush has have been given us in, and likewise to redirect the “conflict on Terrorism” greater efficiently, and faraway from this Cowboy/Rambo innovations-set employed by skill of Bush and his Henchmen, calls for somebody of the two militia or strategic competence. Hillary could be sturdy at making chocolate chip cookies... yet good now we want somebody who demonstrates mastery of the two militia techniques and foreign places international kinfolk.
2016-09-28 04:06:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Something tells me you've already formed your opinion, outside of a legitimate "dialogue".
I've been to a couple town hall "chats" with President Bush, and find it to be a very well choreographed infommercial. So perhaps when the President starts, others will follow suit.
(Don't hold your breath)
2007-01-29 10:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Fluff.
2007-01-29 10:33:45 · answer #4 · answered by Tink 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Or do you think she will only continue to answer fluff, softball questions from those who support her anyway?"
It worked for George Bush.
2007-01-29 10:36:22 · answer #5 · answered by romulusnr 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is just another stunt to fool the masses.
2007-01-29 10:38:20 · answer #6 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She probably would do more listening and answering than our current president!
2007-01-29 10:35:33 · answer #7 · answered by newcalalily 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
she insulted her husband bill clinton an evil man, she outted herself, no more presdenciy for her.
2007-01-29 10:34:16 · answer #8 · answered by ihateacaf0 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
she only states what the polls tell her too.
2007-01-29 10:33:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋