2007-01-29 09:34:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
By who, with what money?
2007-01-29 09:37:41 · answer #1 · answered by i_liked_dos 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The problem with terror is its unsought search for truth and honor. The common terrorist never achieves to comprehend the reasons before their acts against human will. He will always vindict others into his particular trauma, personality. When he does not get some for himself he troubles the mind and respect to progress into secluded and remote areas and stablish requisites for murder and not guilty action.
Terror should be fought on every continent if any decency was to ingenious thinkers, they never see to their wishes but understand how to control the violence. The petty disclaimers on arrogance and ethnic research are very persuasive to undermine the eloquence and pathways to manhood. Difference is terror seeks guilt, and agenda seeks agreement.
No better esteem of foreigners activities than seeing they are into peace, not guilt. Are we blind? cure is belief.
2007-01-29 17:49:52 · answer #2 · answered by Manny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it should be. I think that the U.N. is outdated and that the different nations should get together and chart a new charter for human conduct. Most terrorism comes from a twisted culture or line of thinking. Stopping any teaching or preaching whether in school, places of worship, newspaper, etc. that encourages violence against others or that proclaims absolute truth should be banned by law.
2007-01-29 17:41:10 · answer #3 · answered by seek_fulfill 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is being fought on every continent, except two, the Artic and Antartica, haven't you been watching the news???
2007-01-29 17:41:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but that continent of Europe isn't giving us that much help against that continent of Asia.
2007-01-29 17:38:17 · answer #5 · answered by bigsey93harrison37 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Considering that terrorist cells are popping up all over the world, I'd say wherever they go, we have to go - IF the country they are setting up in isn't taking care of it. There are new terrorist cells all over Europe for instance.
2007-01-29 17:53:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who are you proposing do that job? If you are suggesting President Bush, I say no, I have seen his capabilities over the last four years. We are not the world's police.
2007-01-29 17:39:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the answer is yes, then shouldn't we have started fighting right wing extremists in North America after they attacked us in Oklahoma City?
2007-01-29 17:39:15 · answer #8 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought it was. Haven't you seen the news?
2007-01-29 17:37:53 · answer #9 · answered by J.R. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
hwen its centralized its easier to et em they wilingly come to you
2007-01-29 17:39:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Antarctica is pretty safe.
2007-01-29 17:37:35 · answer #11 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋