are you with george w bush or hilary? which is or would make a good president. please explain if you can
2007-01-29 09:26:50 · 23 answers · asked by jake 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well there is only 2 options there.. Bush and Hillary??
Well Bush has already proven he does not make a good president. He is voted as the 3rd worse president in US history. So that rules him out.. Everything he has done and is trying to do is not working.
Now Hillary, has not been president, so we do not know for a fact if she would or would not be a good president. She stood beside the war issue before but now has changed her mind.. Many thinks that that is a terrible way to go. However I think it is pretty smart since we have seen what this war has done, and how the effects of Bush controlling the military have been terrible.
So out of the 2 options I would have to go with Hillary just because the other option is bush. IMO it is great that this is his last term and he can not run again. just wish 08 will hurry up and get here so he can be gone...
2007-01-29 09:46:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mickey Mouse!
Election is too far off to make a decision yet. If vote was today, President Bush would not be in it.
Pretend election today?
Not sure, Bush because he sorta sees the mistakes he made and is shuffling to fix them. or Hillary to get fresh ideas in and perhaps a workable solution to this fiasco that we have become entrenched in.
Too early to decide that though, maybe the Republicans will have a better candidate , I do not vote party lines, I vote for who I feel is best qualified or will at least talk straight and open when asked a question.
Mickey Mouse! âºâ»
2007-01-29 17:47:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all I am not on the side of either. I try to side with who I feel is best for our country. I consider myself to be a Republican but that does not mean I approve of everything President Bush has done. But I have to say I find very very little I like about Hillary Clinton. At least President Bush is willing to stand by the decisions he makes whether they are right or wrong. He doesn't blame others for his mistakes. Hillary is an individual who thinks whatever she does is right and that everyone should agree with her. She has no backbone and stands for nothing. Her moral fiber is non-existent. She chose to stand by a husband who cheated on her over and over. She stood by his side when he lied to congress while she chastises President Bush for the same thing. She stood by her husband while he broke the law and obstructed justice. She has stated that he will be a major part of her campaign. In order to keep that male slut out of the white house in any form I will actively campaign against Hillary if she wins her party's nomination. So in answer to your question I will choose the least of two evils. President Bush
2007-01-29 17:40:10 · answer #3 · answered by Steve O 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton would make a terrible president because she is at war with 'the individual'. She thinks that the federal government can solve everyone's problems (health care, retirement, etc.) People need to step back and think about the last time they went to the DMV or to get a Social Security card. Chances are it was the most miserable experience of your life. Imagine if the nation's healthcare were run this way! Let's let the free market promote quality and availability!!
2007-01-29 18:12:00 · answer #4 · answered by Brodie 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, we already know that GW Bush is NOT a good President so that rules him out...I think Hillary would be just as much of a miserable failure as Bush is.....so the answer imo is none of the above
2007-01-29 17:31:01 · answer #5 · answered by fade_this_rally 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush has already proven to be a poor leader and will end up leaving the US in worse shape than when he found it.
Hillary Clinton has been a fairly good senator for NY state, however, on a national scale I believe she is un-electable. She is just too polarizing and carries too much baggage.
2007-01-29 17:38:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I'm on NEITHER of their sides. George represents the extreme right and Hillary represents the extreme left. I'm not one of the extremes....I'm somewhere in the middle. They both have some good "ideas", but they both have some bad ones, too. And neither if them will meet in the middle. I'm on MY side, and on the side of the American people. What I think we need is a Non-Partisan President, one who will actually try to find solutions to problems rather than obeying "The Party".
2007-01-29 17:34:03 · answer #7 · answered by kj 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
neither. hillary would be way worse, but bush isnt great. If Hillary gets into office, sources say she will become a dictator and take over the army. She'll raise taxes to %99. The rich wont get richer, but the poor won't either. The poor will get poorer. It all has to do with fundamentals of economics. There are classes on it.
2007-01-29 17:33:29 · answer #8 · answered by Nate L 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well we already know the kind of president George Bush is.
Anything would be an improvement.
We know Hilary keeps her commitments - for instance her wedding vows - for better or for worse.
2007-01-29 17:39:50 · answer #9 · answered by Lou 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Hillary changes her mind too much. She also backed down from her husband after she found out he cheated on her numerous times. I have no choice but to question her ability to run this country and deal with the problems we face today. Bush is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. He's keeping the war over there. He's acting instead of reacting. I would rather have him than Hillary.
2007-01-29 17:36:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋