classified documents while the 9/11 Commission was gathering evidence for their report.
[VIDEO] Rep. Tom Davis wants to know why Sandy Berger isn't forced to take ...
Rep. Tom Davis wants to know why Sandy Berger isn't forced to take polygraph exam over National Archives theft. No Lie Detector Test - Rep. ...
www.foxnews.com/video2/launchPage.h... - 1k - 2007-01-28
THERE IS AN OBVIOUS COVER UP FROM THE CLINTION ADMINISTRATION!
2007-01-29 09:16:57 · 11 answers · asked by Search4truth 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
OMG..there are so many cover ups by the ClintonS administration... This is just a small example.
Thanks for trying to let the foos out there know about some of the crap in the ClintonS administration, but to be honest.. NONE of the Idiotic left are ever going to listen. They are much happier with there heads in the sand...
.
2007-01-29 09:28:17 · answer #1 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Sandy Berger = hypothesis Conspiracy nonsence = data many each and every physique is unwilling to seem at because of the fact that's hard to swallow. The 9/11 value document authors now say it grew to become into bogus. data approximately 9/11 are obtainable in the standard public area, no longer your popular television channel. you may actually only speculate what Sandy had. So quite what's the nonsense?
2016-11-23 12:42:34 · answer #2 · answered by inabinet 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will answer your question if you can tell me what the headline story was before 9/11 happened. If you guessed the Gary Condit? Chandra Levy story you were correct, just think the planes crashing into those buildings killing thousands of innocent people, Condit sitting watching TV thinking, that's great, I killed an intern and now it doesnt matter. Condit I remember YOU are a murderer. GUILTY!
2007-01-29 09:26:35 · answer #3 · answered by DA 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First, Berger broke the law and should pay for the crime. Second, there is no proof for or against the allegation it was documents that had anything to do with 9/11. Third, there is no Clinton administration anymore. Fourth, drawing the conclusion there is a cover up is ludicrous.
2007-01-29 09:22:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
There is no Clinton administration. There hasn't been one for 6 years. Davis is an opportunist who has continuously hammered Clinton for 10 years.
2007-01-29 09:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Very true, but the "liberal" double standard does not allow for the truth and accepts the wrong doing so someone else can be blamed for their failures.
2007-01-29 10:04:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
good luck with that sandy berger thing....have you changed anyones mind.....NO... but thats ok its up to you to keep repeating sandy berger over and over again on this forum ...By the way how is that drug addict Rush doing have you sent him his daily dose of dope and megga dittos today....i swear if rush told you that dog poop sandwiches are what president bush eats everyday for lunch (and im sure he does ) you would be following my st. bernard around with a glad ziplock baggie to seal in the freshness
2007-01-29 09:31:02 · answer #7 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Gee thats funny, why did the justice department rule that there was no wrongdoing? Real conspiracy? Please, lay off fox snooze, its rotting your brain.
2007-01-29 09:31:52 · answer #8 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bingo!
2007-01-29 09:22:25 · answer #9 · answered by C B 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
A Clinton cover-up!?!?!?! But wasn't he was the most HONEST President we ever had?!?!?!?!?
2007-01-29 09:21:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋