ok,it's out. The 'Hill' is definitely running for President in 2008. Why or why not vote for her? Let's be real here, please.
2007-01-29 09:15:48 · 11 answers · asked by Forever 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I would not vote for Hilary. She is to far to the left. She has her own hidden agenda and it has nothing to do with the people of the United States.
2007-01-29 10:10:58 · answer #1 · answered by pat1268 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not this election. Clinton was the first First Lady to have been subpoenaed to testify before a Federal grand jury when she was called in January 1996 to explain circumstances surrounding the sudden reemergence of documents regarding her work at the Rose Law firm.[22][23] This was in connection with the Whitewater affair, for which she never faced criminal charges. During her time as First Lady, Clinton was also the subject of official investigations regarding firings in the White House travel office, the circumstances of White House counsel Vince Foster's death, and the improper use of FBI background files. In none of these cases was Clinton ever officially charged with any wrongdoing. She also supported the war in Iraq.
2007-01-29 09:39:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would like to think that I would vote for an American President that is a woman. However I will not vote for Hillary, mostly because she's a left wing liberal who dosen't share my point-o-view. If I was a liberal I still wouldn't vote for her because of the fact that Bill walked all over her and she stayed with him, If she can't stand up to him how will she deal with politics, or maybe they are in a loveless marriage and she just stays with him for her own gain, either way it makes her look weak and pathedic in the eyes of other world leaders who will no doubt take advantage of that.
2007-01-29 09:39:25 · answer #3 · answered by scottyhog 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the two Pakistan and England had a woman chief! what's every physique interior the US lacking? it fairly is not appropriate no count in case you're male or woman or your race. What concerns is that the guy who's elected posses all the characteristics and characteristics the their components desire. and that they could handle and make stated judgements so as to control the rustic. It kills me that folk vote according to gender or race. That tells me that the voter did not make an stated determination relatively an 'off the cuff' determination.
2016-12-13 03:49:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely vote for a woman, but definitely not for Hillary. She just sort of freaks me out (and her smug looks during the State of the Union didn't do much for me). I've been a democrat my whole life and will be disappointed if we can't find someone better then her.
2007-01-29 10:05:44 · answer #5 · answered by straightup 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote for someone just because she is a woman. Thats just as bad as voting for someone because they are white,or black. I don't like Hilary Clinton as much as Bush and I am harldly a republican. I know I would vote for a female canidate if they had their priorities strait.
2007-01-29 09:22:21 · answer #6 · answered by angel 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let's elect hillary and have another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
Remember:
-Filegate
-Travelgate
-Illegal fundraising
-whitewater
-Calling for the impeachment of Nixon for "lying in office" just like her husband
2007-01-29 10:01:35 · answer #7 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, in 1998 i think Elizabeth Dole should have ran instead of her husband Bob.
2007-01-29 09:54:59 · answer #8 · answered by JustShutUp 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have to defeat Hillary. She is an ultra leftwing extremist. Her gender is irrelevant, except to the feminazis (but even they are hypocrits, they would never support Condi)
2007-01-29 09:26:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If there's a woan worth voting for, SURE!
But "Hell"ery is not it!
KEEP THE MAD COW OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE
2007-01-29 10:02:56 · answer #10 · answered by Daystar 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋