They just didn't ALLOW it, they facilitated it! They should be tried for treason as they did whatever they did while Al Qaida planned their multiple attacks on us...
2007-01-29 08:31:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Pure Teflon- Just like Sandy Burglar can impede a federal investigation by destroying documents that made his boss look like dung- and he gets his hand slapped and keeps his security clearance. Clinton and the whole staff belong at Gitmo.
2007-01-29 08:43:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The people you mention had nothing to do with 9/11. For one thing they had been out of office nearly a year by then.
They did not send people off to war in a country that was not provoking us nor was any danger to us. They did not lie about WMD or out CIA agents. You need to read a little more, if you can, and you would find that the families Bush, Bin Laden, and Saud are all buddies. Perhaps that has something to do with events as they have happened?
I was amused about all the hoopla and the millions of dollars spent to try and discredit Bill Clinton over a ******** by a consenting adult and how those who vehemently went after Clinton don't seem to think attacking a sovereign nation who had nothing to do with 9/11 and who was no threat to us is somehow okay.
2007-01-29 16:40:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you look back, Condi Rice admitted that G. Bush received a memo from Ben Laden telling him of his intentions. G. Bush remained on vacation and ignored this warning. I ask you, "If someone tells you they might or will burglarize your home, don't you lock the door?" Bush did nothing about security, allowing foreigners to take flying lessons at our expense even after they said they did not need to learn how to land and attention was brought to the administration concerning this and it was ignored. All that had to be done was to better the security on all modes of transportation.
He is now allowing illegal immigrants to flood into our country from all over the world through Mexico and Canada and does not have proper security in place at our ports of entry. When the next attack occurs, will you still blame Clinton for this administration's carelessness? The blame lies with George Bush.
2007-01-29 16:51:43 · answer #3 · answered by madisonian51 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I was under the impression Bush was in office when 9/11 happened, so how could Clinton allow it?
2007-01-29 16:43:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
maybe it's because the bush adminstration was in power for a year and a half when this happened and they were the ones who ignored the warnings get your facts straight i am just amazed by what people are trying to blame clinton for it's un real he was out of the white house for almost 2 years
2007-01-29 16:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by auntie s 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you do do that you will have to include Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft as they were all in office and had been for 9 months when it happened.
2007-01-29 16:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the same reason we arent bringing charges against bush, cheney, etc... for doing absolutely nothing to stop 9-11 from happening during his first 8 months. nothing could be done! it would have happened anyway.
2007-01-29 16:35:55 · answer #7 · answered by 2010 CWS Champs! 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Since it happened on George's watch and since he and his crew ignored the concerns of the Clinton adminstration, no.
2007-01-29 16:40:59 · answer #8 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To bad you cannot join the front line forces and be a Bush body.
2007-01-29 16:36:55 · answer #9 · answered by kritikos43 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You guys already had a witch-hunt against clinton. See what it got you? Bupkus.
2007-01-29 16:41:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋