2007-01-29 08:24:17 · 12 answers · asked by Caitlin O 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
Art - it's a brilliant story, a brilliant movie and it's hard to stomach. I feel sorry for anyone who can only see this as trash.
2007-01-29 08:32:18 · answer #1 · answered by scruffy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the eye of the beholder is filled with art, then art is what he will see. The same holds true for the trash.
2007-01-30 12:31:38 · answer #2 · answered by Konswayla 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When I first saw it, some twenty or more years ago; I thought it was trash. Today I am more on the art side of it.
2007-01-30 07:23:57 · answer #3 · answered by jacquesh2001 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely art. One of the best filmmakers of all time.
2007-01-29 20:23:14 · answer #4 · answered by sktchgrl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
art love the book the thought process is amazing
2007-01-29 16:31:47 · answer #5 · answered by roezy@sbcglobal.net 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If it is art, I just left a masterpiece floating in the toilet just now!
2007-01-29 17:33:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
trashy art or arty trash - all reviews are the sole point of view of their authors - no one is right or wrong - choose for yourself
2007-01-29 16:33:03 · answer #7 · answered by Lee 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I personally think it is brilliant art.
"I was cured all right...."
yes! how can you top that ending?
2007-01-29 16:32:22 · answer #8 · answered by parrotjohn2001 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not a bad movie, but probably overrated
(like Pulp Fiction).
2007-01-29 16:31:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Art......Kubrick made it !!
2007-01-29 16:33:23 · answer #10 · answered by Hidden 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋