2007-01-29 08:20:54 · 10 answers · asked by >>HaRdY BoYz<< (EAW) 5 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I did but Shawn Micaels should have won
2007-01-29 10:41:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your Maker : 1996 was an absolutely awful Rumble in comparison to the greatest of the series so far, 1990. Now that was well-booked Rumble! Every single entry was designed to get the maximum reaction from the crowd and the match included the first Hogan vs Ultimate Warrior confrontation. All-time classic!
2007-01-29 09:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by thingfishy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was a good Rumble but nothing will be better than the 1995 Royal Rumble. Best Rumble ever!
2007-01-29 08:49:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thaught that the Royal Rumble was above average but not the BEST. The John Cena vs Umaga match was definatley amazing and I also liked the match. The test vs Bobby lashly was TERIABLE and was a waste of time. TAKE ECW OFF THE AIR
2007-01-29 08:48:10 · answer #4 · answered by TheMainEvent 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Me
I didn't see the Hardyz MNM match coz I hadn't found a website that showed it. Test v. lashley was lame
Batista and Kennedy was ok
Then it got fun
That Cena Umaga match was off the chain-LOL
The royal Rumble.........words don't explain it.
2007-01-29 09:04:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
2004 rumble win with benoit
2007-01-29 08:43:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For my money, 1996 Rumble kills all competition.
2007-01-29 08:50:13 · answer #7 · answered by Your Maker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Cena vs Umaga
That is the sickest match ever!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-29 08:38:01 · answer #8 · answered by fe_fe3000 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
me
2007-01-29 08:32:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yh it was sick
2007-01-29 08:39:56 · answer #10 · answered by jimmy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋