English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

You might be looking for Portugal, here. One of the differences between Portugal and other colonizers was that at the time of its colonial expansion, Portugal did not have surplus population displaced by economic change.

This of course only lasted till the 1680s, when a revolution in Portugal caused a significant chunk of population to emigrate to Brasil.

Spain used the conquest/colonization of the New World as an outlet for surplus testosterone (unemployed young men).

England, France and Germany had industrialized just preceding their colonial adventuers.

Of course, in many areas, earlier commenters are correct, that this was true to some degree (i.e. in some of their territories) for the other colonizers as well.

2007-01-29 08:31:18 · answer #1 · answered by umlando 4 · 0 0

France - with southeast asia, haiti, they did not "people" those colonies but most authories and administrators were French. also, they imposed certain aspects of a french hierarchy and had an influence on culture.

The same can be said of British and its non-commonwealth colonies (i.e. not Canada and Australia) - India, African nations, Ireland, etc.

2007-01-29 07:55:38 · answer #2 · answered by ms. g 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers