2007-01-29 07:21:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
it would be too much like honesty
2007-01-29 07:25:02 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's pretty ridiculous. Troop levels have fluctuated constantly since the war began. There were times when we've had more troops in-theater than what we will have when the so-called "surge" is executed. Why the President even bothered to discuss it as if it were a build-up is beyond my understanding. It was like painting a giant target on his administration. He should have just DONE it, without talking about it, and then if asked, just said that he was bringing our troop levels BACK UP to a previous level, to help out with some security missions, then just shut the hell up about it.
Every OTHER time troop levels were decreased or built up, there was MAYBE 10 minutes worth of news stories about it. Why is this different?
.
2007-01-29 15:27:29 · answer #2 · answered by I hate friggin' crybabies 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you saying that the talk should be they are fed up with Bush instead of actually formulating and deciding on a plan for Iraq?
2007-01-29 15:25:59 · answer #3 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are fed up with bush but they are going about it in a diplomatic or as most like to say a politically correct way
2007-01-29 15:28:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think everyone has been dropping hints like crazy but Bush believes in Govt. of the people, by Bush, for Bush.
2007-01-29 15:26:09 · answer #5 · answered by doktordbel 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought they communicated that months ago.
2007-01-29 15:24:18 · answer #6 · answered by jeffpsd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋