like she gives a damn about anything but power and fame
2007-01-29 06:34:58 · 24 answers · asked by jack m 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Talk about uninformed. That's your whole argument, that all is wants is power and fame. She serves on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee; the Environment and Public Works Committee; the Special Committee on Aging; and she is the first New Yorker ever to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Senator Clinton chairs the Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee, responsible for communicating with the public about key issues before Congress. What do YOU do all day???
2007-01-29 06:47:18 · answer #1 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People in general are perverse. People also like to pull for the underdog - up to a point. Which to me means that as soon as the primaries start, the old baggage with Hillary Rodham will start to make the political headlines.
She is, as you say an egotistical, power hungry politician who has bamboozled the voters in New York. So now she will try it nationwide.
She is counting on women to put her in, in conjunction with the Rainbow crowd, along with the politically correct socialists who want a one world government.
2007-01-29 06:47:07 · answer #2 · answered by The Cythian 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't worry. Hillary is a career politician and lawyer with a shady past...those issues will surface again. Even if nothing was conclusive from the Whitewater investigation. (Doesn't help that the folks who knew too much turned up mysteriously DEAD).
What I am saying is that there is a silent majority in America who have a disdain and distrust for Hillary and her kind. She can not win the Northwast, the Midwest, the South, and maybe not even PA.
Shhh...don't tell Hollywood, the media or any of their bamboozled followers...let them have their fun for now....
2007-01-29 07:33:53 · answer #3 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton talks a lot, but she is terrific at keeping just beyond the radar when the proverbial fecal matter hits the occillating contraption. She is a wild, wooly woman. I wouldn't vote her dog catcher if she tied a slab of angus beef around her neck.
2007-01-29 07:15:57 · answer #4 · answered by cornbread 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Apparently there is something to Senator Clinton. I do not intend to vote for her but some people see her as capable and somehow better than the others running. Time will tell.
2007-01-29 06:39:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I am a liberal who usually votes Democrat. As of yet I am not a supporter of any candidate for President. I am still waiting to see what stances teh candidates from both parties, as well as any independants take. Unlike you I do not make up my mind until I have thouraghly researced the candidates. Senator Clinton has built up a good reputation for representing her constituants. Her overwhelming re-election garnered voters from both parties. She has always taken a strong stand on health care issues. I personally believe this is an important issue and support legislators on both sides of the aisle who struggle to make sure all citizens have decent health care.
I seriously doubt Senator Clinton is anymore power or fame hungry than any other candidate. It is definately time we cut through the rhetoric and started casting informed ballots. Don't base your vote on what you have heard others say. Base it on what you have learned through your own research. It is not our responsibility as citizens to parrot or blindly follow someone elses pre-packaged party line. It is our responsibility to cast informed votes. It's high time we lived up to that responsibility.
2007-01-29 06:43:49 · answer #6 · answered by toff 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
People are very uninformed and still believing what there told by the main stream media.
2007-01-29 10:14:28 · answer #7 · answered by pat1268 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
From the responses I'm getting, i don't think anyone who supports Hillary really knows anything about her. They all claim she's done so much, or she's helped out so much, but if you really look at what she's done, all she has done is just to be very vocal about other people's ideas and projects...
2007-01-29 07:11:26 · answer #8 · answered by badneighborvt 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are people who would vote for her - a lot of you out there put her husband in office - remember? once a clinton, always a clinton. she couldn't keep him in line - how could she run our country? she won't win and yes, i would vote for condelisa rice over her, anyday!!
2007-01-29 11:44:11 · answer #9 · answered by Forever 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Free country mate
2007-01-29 07:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋