When you usually buy them in singles? Also, a pair of underwear. Weird
2007-01-29 05:46:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Main Entry: pant
Function: noun
Etymology: short for pantaloons
1 : an outer garment covering each leg separately and usually extending from the waist to the ankle -- usually used in plural
2007-01-29 06:43:05 · answer #1 · answered by crct2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no one is prevalent with this! yet I do, and you approximately to. Trousers as we positioned on at present bypass in basic terms back to the 10th century. They weren't needed till knights began wearing armor and needed something physique-installation to bypass below. earlier that folk wore robes, togas, etc. In those days, they have been separate tubes to place over your legs, called -breeches-. 2 tubes. there replaced right into a type of breechcloth affiliation to bypass between them, which served as undies. This somewhat is the predecessor of the codpiece. Later, some clever individual discovered a thank you to make one garment that coated the two legs and abdomen. however the belief of it being a 'pair' remained. people continually ask why this is a 'pair' of pants yet one one bra. The bra's predecessor replaced into the bodice, a good form of girdle-ingredient worn decrease than the shirt (or somewhat of a shirt) to hold a woman's protuberances in and shop them from getting interior the way. The bra, as orignally stepped forward, replaced into purely a extra stepped forward a type of, extra advantageous suited to the female anatomy.
2016-12-16 16:19:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Single of pants just sounds sort of silly really....bad idea...they just went straight away to pair...
all nice and tidy that way.
2007-01-29 05:53:32 · answer #3 · answered by JC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well technically they are called trousers,as far as the " i need a pair of underwear",i guess it's because it has two openings for your legs.
2007-01-29 05:53:34 · answer #4 · answered by stormy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It comes from when they referred to each as a pantalette so a pair of pantalettes. Therefore pair of pants.
2007-01-29 08:25:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
For the leg openings.
2007-01-29 06:39:57 · answer #6 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 leg holes lol
2007-01-29 05:51:57 · answer #7 · answered by Zorlinda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why do they say men wear "underpants"?
2007-01-29 05:55:19 · answer #8 · answered by Tek ~aka~Legs! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋