English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think DC has a valid point ? are the BNP as radical as those Muslims, I have not heard of any BNP member's becoming suicide bomber's. Would we be better off banning BNP and Islamic religion ?

2007-01-29 05:30:29 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

17 answers

This is just a David Cameron soundbite:
a. To gain middle England voters support by driving a wedge between moderate and radicalised muslims, ensuring a large moderate muslim vote at the next general election. You will see Gandhi Brown doing something similar soon.
b. To bring the BNP into the same category as muslim HOMICIDE bombers (please do not call them suicide bombers) is rather nonsensical.
Both the Tories and Labour are terrified of the BNP gaining more seats, they have only themselves to blame for the rise in popularity and support of the BNP.
You may create laws to stop indigenous home grown whites from speaking what they feel and experience as being (a reverse racism in this country). But you cannot stop the tide of feeling that people have toward the insane multicultural ethos of this present government. A double minded leader is unstable in all his ways.
Government caved in to the IRA bombings and murderers, giving adams and co a foothold as MPs..what next..offer the tube bombers a place in government?

2007-01-29 09:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I agree with most people on here. The BNP may have ****ed up values, by these psyco nutters are trying to start World War 3.

I heard on radio 4 today 70% of normal muslims want the death penalty for muslims who convert from Islam to a different religion. If normal muslims have this view, the extreamist views are far more out wacked out.

Yes the BNP are thugs. Islamic extreamists are calculated cold blooded mass murderers. Its not a good comparison.

I do believe the extreamists want to start World War 3, a 'holy war', I cant think of any other reason why they are doing what they are doing. There is no logic behind it. They dont have enough power to over throw western socity without escualating the "conflict" to a world war and get many countries dragged in. Why are muslims killing muslims in Iraq? Yes, part of ot maybe internal fighting, but most of it is to get Iraq into civil war. Unstable the area and start a huge war.....I dont think the BNP would do that.

2007-01-29 06:10:10 · answer #2 · answered by lister_larger 3 · 3 0

I believe optimal persons on precise right here. The BNP would have ****ed up values, through ability of those psyco nutters attempt to commence international conflict 3. I heard on radio 4 on the on the spot 70% of wide-spread muslims go with the shortcoming of life penalty for muslims who convert from Islam to a particular faith. If time-honored muslims have this view, the extreamist perspectives are a lot more desirable out wacked out. certain the BNP are thugs. Islamic extreamists are calculated chilly blooded mass murderers. Its no longer a life like evaluation. I do believe the extreamists go with to commence international conflict 3, a 'holy conflict', I cant imagine of of the diverse reason they're doing what they're doing. there is not any common sense interior the lower back of it. They dont have sufficient ability to over throw western socity without escualating the "conflict" to a international conflict and get many countries dragged in. Why are muslims killing muslims in Iraq? certain, area of ot perchance inner scuffling with, yet optimal of it is to get Iraq into civil conflict. risky the realm and commence a huge conflict.....I dont imagine of the BNP may do this.

2016-10-16 06:29:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, David Cameron does NOT have a valid point. Since when did the BNP use suicide bombers? David Cameron is an idiot.

2007-01-29 08:11:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The BNP are simply a threat to all failing political parties.

Cameron,was simply buying into the muslim block vote and saying all the usual platitudes.

Hague seems to have things weighed up,why isnt he conservative leader?


We no longer have freedom of speech and we are weary of the usual tolerance lectures, while our country crumbles back to the stone age.

Desperate situations like this call for drastic measures.
Frankly,we need the BNP.

2007-01-29 07:48:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I think having the BNP in control would be very bad for the country. But something has to be done about the growing islamic threat to the UK!

2007-01-29 05:55:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Extremist muslims are worse than the BNP for the simple reason that the BNP do not use suicide bombers

2007-01-29 05:42:22 · answer #7 · answered by Daisy Roots 5 · 6 0

Let,s Face it -- David Cameron seems incapable of Saying any thing that Normal , everyday folk don,t already Know ,,, the B N P CAN,T be Compared with the Evil "Global Islamic" Tyrants threatening the Whole of the Free World ---God (Not Allah) help us If we Have to rely on David Cameron - when we are eventually rid of this Prat Blair and his "Rotten to the Core" so called Government

2007-01-29 05:54:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 5 0

To ban Islam because some Muslims are extremist is rather OTT.
But he does have a point. Any ideology that says we are right therefore others are inferior is as bad as racism.
Do not kid yourself that BNP folk are not into violence, even if not suicidally.

2007-01-29 06:46:09 · answer #9 · answered by alan h 1 · 1 3

He is voicing a point of view to provoke discussion and debate but as usual Muslims take offence and moan about how hard done by they are.

Count yourselves lucky you are free to voice a protest, if you don't like it, there is an alternative. Move to a country where sharia law is practised.

2007-01-30 00:32:06 · answer #10 · answered by LYN W 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers