Are we too dependent on Corporations to provide for us?

Question

Has it gotten to a point to where the few people who control corporations are able to control the rest of us?

Answer 1

The culture has become "stuff" oriented. We buy so many more things than we need. We literally are supporting the corporate bullies when we continue to buy bigger TVs and newer technology when we really don't need them. It works both ways, though. If we didn't buy a lot of plasma TVs (for example), the companies who produce them wouldn't be able to continually lower the price as much as they have....and also, there wouldn't be smaller companies trying to produce similar quality plasma TVs for less money than the big guys to gain market share and drive down prices. So, in relation to the "stuff", it's pretty self-regulating.

BUT, cable companies seem to be the exception. I can't figure out why they charge as much as they do except that they have contracts with locations (counties and cities), that allow them to be the exclusive carrier in that location. This is all kinds of wrong in my book.

A simple answer to your question is yes. We have convinced ourselves we need them and we don't. We don't need anything from them except to provide honest, reliable service with someone who can understand our problem as we explain it in English. Gas prices have fallen a lot lately. Wonder if their prices will?

Answer 2

Corporations provide products and services that you can choose to purchase / subscribe. You are not required to buy any, so I fail to see where the control is. Do you like what corporations offer? Then you make that choice, and in some sense they do control you. I don't see how things could be any other way, honestly. I respect corporations that make services like cell phones etc, if you can do better, do it, otherwise you are forced to deal with what they provide or nothing at all.

Answer 3

Corporations only control the businesses that they own. America has a free market economy. If you don't want to support such and such corporation, don't buy their products. If you work for one and feel you are being oppressed in some way, you can always look for a new job.

Answer 4

that's libertarian that want government to no longer do something yet grant the mandatory issues. besides, i do no longer see how the failings you mentioned makes companies "government-based." companies regularly function and assemble money independently and run their very own affairs. that's all it quite is meant by using getting companies be capitalistic. Even government in many cases builds those roads by using contracting the form to a private business enterprise. Likewise, the army is geared up by using inner maximum companies as nicely. the government would not make stuff, and motives why, is as a results of the fact maximum American have faith that government isn't useful at doing those issues. are you able to think of government organizing a motor vehicle-making production unit? that's why we've an self sufficient standard autos and Ford. the government does assemble taxpayer money and additionally supplies out money to banks so they are able to very own loan with the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is able to print and create money, that's what all companies use to make employer ensue and to assemble their sales. confident, all of us place self belief in government, yet that's no longer what's meant by using asserting that somebody is "based on government." Being based on government is whilst government is working something quickly or whilst somebody is getting help from government quickly. As somebody else reported, government is genuinely greater based on companies than companies to government. government quite isn't something. It would not do something, it only regulates stuff and keeps order, in spite of the undeniable fact that it's not what creates issues, and government continually seeks the help of companies to make something.