It makes sense that if somebody is trying to harm our troops or stop us from achieving our goal, or killing innocent citizens in Iraq, that we will stop them," Bush said on Friday.
seems like we are doing a lot of the killing and the harming of Innocent citrizens.
but i really need to hear from our President, exactly what our goal in Iraq is and how he intends to get there.
2007-01-29 05:22:18 · 12 answers · asked by ellisd1950 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
to "Hopeful"
I am a veteran, i know what happens in a war, I know what the guys in the field are going through. i know the feelings and i know the reactions. At age 56, i am too old to enlist, all i can do is offer support and taxes. the soldiers get that.
but i want to know the goal.
2007-01-29 05:42:36 · update #1
the goal is to give the freedom of their government to the people of Iraq!
2007-01-29 06:48:26 · answer #1 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was to be originally called Operation Iraqi Liberation until somebody in the marketing department, product "rollout" division, of the White House realized the the acronym got too close to the truth. And we don't have a president but really an UNelected dictator. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2007-01-29 13:33:42 · answer #2 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Killing innocent citizens?
What a laugh.
The same innocent citizens that have their kids throwing grenades at our troops?
What ever
Here is why we are there.. We need the sand. We are sick of recycling so we want more sand to make more bottles.
Makes as much sense as your comments.
2007-01-29 13:33:20 · answer #3 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he refuses to answer on account of then having to follow up those 'clear objectives' with a 'clear agenda'. He doesn't want deadlines (for the life of me I don't know why) so he will not state clearly his objectives. I just asked a similar question that will post here in a moment. I'd love to hear your take
2007-01-29 13:27:21 · answer #4 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Failure to say "Oh we think we acted too fast and was seduced by an oil rich country"
2. Failure to say "We dont know who's the enemy anymore
3. Failure to understand that not every country is ready to adopt democracy [regardless of the fact that its 2007] and forcing them to do so is wrong...
4. And acknowledgin that they acted like a vengeful baby by attackin people whose connection to the bombings was bearin physical resemblance to osama. . . .
2007-01-29 13:46:00 · answer #5 · answered by Millie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. The answer keeps changing.
From an iminent threat of using WMD on the US, to WMD-related activities, to not complying with the UN (whom we hate), to freeing the people from Saddam, to spreading democracy to preventing civil war to letting them kill us there so they don't have to travel all the way here to kill us,
Take your pick
2007-01-29 13:31:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you go over there and find out yourself instead of sitting in your safe armchair judging something you know nothing about except what you read in a liberal paper.
2007-01-29 13:28:13 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To set up a Republic you are fairly challenged aren't you,
perhaps you can go offend yourself?
2007-01-29 13:30:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to kill as many people as possible so no one will be there to turn into terrorists
2007-01-29 13:26:01 · answer #9 · answered by Antis Suck 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go rent/buy the documentary "Why We Fight".
2007-01-29 13:26:42 · answer #10 · answered by lunatic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋