English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ss project =]
kthnx(:

2007-01-29 05:14:44 · 8 answers · asked by dfgfdg f 1 in Arts & Humanities History

8 answers

Washington was a great general and an outstanding man. In any war there will both defeats and victories. It's only the last one that really counts.

2007-01-29 05:19:12 · answer #1 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 0 0

Because Washington was never defeated. His lost a number of battles but he did not loose the war. There is a big difference. The American revolution was alive as long as the Continental Congress and the Continental Army was alive. Washington had the very difficult job of trying to defeat the British Army (which at the time had the best army and navy and was the greatest nation on the earth) without losing his army. Often he was outnumber, out supplied, was facing better trained and experienced troops with mostly young kids you were in school or farmers the year before. He and his officers made many mistakes because they lacked the knowledge of warfare. But Washington had the ability to learn for his mistakes, and managed to keep the army together. You must realize that the soldiers of Washington's army were volunteers, with various terms of enlistments. Several times he managed to finally train an army into a unit that can stand against the British army only for the terms of there enlistments to expire then he had to start all over. He had to beg congress for the money to pay the troops, equip and feed his troops. Washington himself served without pay. He avoided taking the food from farms by force and tried to buy the food and supplies whenever possible.

There are a number of very good books on Washington and the American Revolution may I suggest that you expand your knowledge because Washington was a very interesting person, after all he was the father of the United States.

2007-01-29 05:36:14 · answer #2 · answered by DeSaxe 6 · 1 0

He was defeated only in some battles, but kept the ragged American troops together and motivated more than anyone else probably could have, eventually winning the war. He was a great leader, perhaps not a great military strategist.

A hero does not have to be the best at everything - they have to have enough strength and courage to effect a positive result - this he did.

2007-01-29 05:58:52 · answer #3 · answered by walkinandrockin 3 · 0 0

Washington was defeated? What planet did you attend school on? Let me guess..you skip classes frequently? Let me explain something. Losing a battle does not mean you lost. Every great leader loses a battle or two. The only thing that counts is who won the war. Last time I checked we use dollars here and not pounds so I guess Washington won.

2007-01-29 05:44:12 · answer #4 · answered by crazylifer 3 · 0 1

Without Washington, every one would be too scared to stand up to the red coats.

He jump started courage in the colonists hearts, he was general to the colonist army. He kept us inspired for freedom

2007-01-29 05:25:39 · answer #5 · answered by danksprite420 6 · 0 0

Why did colonists considered George Washington a hero even after he become defeated by technique of French? Washington become no longer a outwardly surprising familiar. He made various mistakes. notwithstanding, it become his ability to rally the adult males and live on adverse to all odds that made him so captivating. Washington turned right into a courageous guy of serious integrity, even with his losses- and the defeat by technique of the French that you communicate of, it wasnt Washington who lost, it become Washington who stood there gallantly attempting to win at the same time as it become no longer conceivable. He become no longer in cost, he served less than the Brits contained in the conflict with the French. Washington become courageous, and gallantry is what made heroes in presently. Why did Andrew Hamilton protect John Peter Zenger and free speech? properly, the reason Hamilton defended Zenger is because the lawyer familiar of the era were given James Alexander and his colleague disbarred, so as that they noted as in Hamilton as a alternative. Hamilton did not protect his correct to free speech, what he become really protecting become freedom of press, earlier it turned right into a Constitutional correct. The case adverse to Zenger become about LIBEL and as the validity of his claims become no longer in question, the court docket ruled that their validity might want to no longer be used as evidence. Hamilton expressed that on the grounds that there become absolute self belief that what he wrote become authentic, he couldnt be convicted for libel. The case become instantly brushed off because for one, Governor Cosby become extensively disliked, as well because the sensibility of the case offered by technique of Hamilton.

2016-12-03 04:53:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If Washington had been defeated by the British we would all be kow-towing to the Queen. Have you noticed that we're not ?
Washington was considered a hero because his army sent the British and the Prussians back where they belong. The British left many soldiers here ( under the ground ) thanks to Washington.

2007-01-29 05:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

He was also charismatic and talked to people like men with responsibilities instead of children whose egos he might bruise.

2007-01-29 05:23:36 · answer #8 · answered by MarauderX 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers