I think there was no real possible outcome except for Shilpa to win, in order to redeem Channel 4 and Endemol Productions. So I am rather cynical about the public vote (who checks this?) which brought about a result that was very convenient to repair the strained diplomatic relations between India and the UK. Am I alone in thinking that this was the result that Channel 4 wanted, rather than the majority of the public?
2007-01-29 03:35:28 · 17 answers · asked by gorgeousfluffpot 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
yes i think its rigged.
and if shilpa never won india would have withdrawn all its assets out of britain, I heard some plonker say as i was watching telly one night.
what are the indian assets?
Are they the indians themselves?
2007-01-29 03:43:57 · answer #1 · answered by tallulaberry 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am glad that she won, as someone else has said she remained dignified and I think that won the public over. She did seem a very nice grounded person as well.
I dont think that C4 could rig the votes either, but I wanted Ian to win!
2007-01-29 03:44:02 · answer #2 · answered by cassie s 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately for C4, the voting is incredibly heavily regulated to make sure that they can't fix it. Which means that Shilpa won fair and square.
I didn't watch it myself, but by the sounds of things her ability to remain dignified under great duress won most people over.
2007-01-29 03:40:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are enough Indians in the UK to vote her into winning the show (plus other people who might have actually liked her more than the others).
2007-01-29 03:52:56 · answer #4 · answered by Stammerman! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even though i think jermain should have won i don't think it was a fix. With all of the bullying she had to put up with behind her it is no wonder that she won. I think she won because she managed to stay, also people wanted to get jade back for calling her a looser. Take a long look at her now goody. xx
2007-01-29 03:43:18 · answer #5 · answered by Queen Bee 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe it was, but more people who weren't voting before probably voted for Shilpa.
2007-01-29 03:53:12 · answer #6 · answered by Pantherempress 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it was a fix. Jermaine should have won. He was much nicer than anybody else in the house.
2007-01-29 03:48:06 · answer #7 · answered by Sylvia C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even more puzzling to a cynic like me, was it more than just a coincidence that the first two to be chucked out last night were no less than
JACK AND DANIY.......
(Think about it.....)
2007-01-29 03:45:52 · answer #8 · answered by wunceinawhile 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it was probably fixed, they had to kid the world that british people actually like ethnic minorities when in fact most dont
2007-01-29 03:57:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
it was a fix from the start, it didnt matter who u voted for they already had their top 3
stay happy
2007-01-29 03:44:59 · answer #10 · answered by dsw 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋