2007-01-29 03:22:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I don't know if it is possible to say one is a better Senator than the other. Both have gotten reputations as being very good at representing their constituants well. Both seem to be very intelligent and well versed on foreign and domestic affairs. The biggest difference may be their stances on the war in Iraq.
2007-01-29 03:26:28 · answer #1 · answered by toff 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Mrs. Hillary clinton
2007-01-29 06:02:12 · answer #2 · answered by amit katiyar 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are similar in idealogy. The difference is that Hillary has had six years to make a dent. She must be doing something right for most of the people of New York State, she was re-elected by a large majority. I think Obama will do well, but he is really just beginning. Gosh I'm lazy this morning, or I'd list out a bunch of their accomplishments to complete your request for a basis.
2007-01-29 04:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No wondering man or woman might want to enable Hillary to contain her 8 years as First woman on her resume, even with the incontrovertible actuality that all of us recognize who wears the pants in THAT marriage of convenience. You wield no political clout as First woman, and all of us recognize that "her" well being care plan turned right into a funny tale. So certain, the in user-friendly words income Hillary has over Obama is 4 years contained in the Senate, and in case you seem at her list she did not do some thing of substance throughout those 4 years (except vote to bypass to conflict in Iraq and then decrease back-pedal later at the same time as the political winds replaced direction...)
2016-12-03 04:47:51 · answer #4 · answered by schebel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Compared with Clinton Obama has no chance in Hell.
Look at Clinton. Very known, well respected, and proven.
Her dedication to a marriage in shame to Bill Clinton and her dedication to her family proves her strength. She has years of experience and is very much qualified to run this country than Obama and I would vote for her because of her experience over him in a heart beat!
2007-01-29 03:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by J.C. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't like either. Hillary is a liar and Obama . . . I think he's a terrorist in disguise! Just look at his name and compare it to the list of names on the 9/11 paperwork. Too close for my comfort.
2007-01-29 03:25:02 · answer #6 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Obama doesn't have enough of a record to look at, there. You can find some stuff if you look at his Illinois record,though.
I wouldn't vote for any of the diversity three, however, they are all globalists.
2007-01-29 05:48:28 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree with the premise that either of these politicians are Senators.
They were elected to serve their respective constituencies, not to have a full time job where they prepare their Presidential campaigns.
2007-01-29 03:27:53 · answer #8 · answered by Razor 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That's like asking would you rather have your toes stomped on or your fingers slammed in the door. the fact that either one could be elected president is scary.
2007-01-29 03:56:15 · answer #9 · answered by dbake50 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hard to say since all either of them has done is to run for president.
Bill Richardson is a governor, dim bulb.
2007-01-29 03:26:29 · answer #10 · answered by Debbie T 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋