Hey maybe you poor old folks should have saved some money. Social Security isnt meant to take care of you for life.
2007-01-29 03:25:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Tell your congressmen/women to quit stealing funds from Social Security to cover other shortfalls and Social Security would be just fine.
As larger numbers of people retire, and live longer this puts a strain on the Social Security budget.
Working isn't necessarily a liberal problem. More and more jobs are being sent to other parts of the world, the ones that are left are being taken by illegal immigrants. With 300,000,000 people living in the United States right now, there aren't enough jobs for every able person.
When you were of working age there was probably an abundance of jobs. Back then there probably weren't 12 million illegal immigrants here to take what few jobs there are. Companies don't have to pay a price for hiring illegals. So it goes on and on. Fewer and fewer jobs available on the homefront cannot support the growing demand for Social Security benefits.
Personally, I have worked hard, and SS payments were deducted from my pay all my life. As I get closer to retirement age, the age requirement has gone up to 67. By the time I retire there won't be funds AT ALL for me. And at the beginning of the year your check was increased. So I wouldn't whine.
2007-01-29 03:39:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Schona 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes & No
The Social Security system will fall apart because it is a pyramid scheme. This is also known as a Ponzi scheme. It is an illegal con game that resurfaces every few years. If any person tried to replicate the Social Security system on their own they would be jailed.
There is no way that a system can give out more than it takes in. The increasing payouts are being made with increasing payins, but eventually the payouts will get too large for the existing population to support.
The Democrats set this system up to fool the average to below average intelligence voter into thinking that the Democrats cared about them.
I am happy since I as a municipal worker I am not in the Social Security system. Think about it Police, Fire, Military, Politicians all are out of Social Security. We have public pensions that can invest the employer & employee contributions to acheive solvency.
And now if both Bush & the Democrats get their way, illegal aliens can get Social Security by working just 18MONTHS in the US, US citizens will have to continue working 40 quarters or 120 months in order to qualify.
2007-01-29 03:25:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No people are just using it to try to gain apolitical advantage!! And one of the answerer's cant help it because she is a Dumocrat but Social Security is a retirement plan for anyone over the age of 65 and also anyone who becomes disabled!! Social security will be available for all people because the Politicians know that the elderly are the ones who can send them home!!
2007-01-29 03:35:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Border Security!! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Social safe practices works merely tremendous. seem on the tremendous social change it made starting up contained in the 30s. elderly human beings now no longer ought to stay with their youngsters and the 'multigenerational kinfolk' has develop right into a component of the previous--plus human beings can retire earlier, freeing up jobs for youthful human beings. The GI bill turned right into a wide success. contained in the Nineteen Fifties, 60s and 70s we had the biggest share of faculty grads contained in the international. We had the biggest share of sources vendors, extra often than not via VHA. contained in the Nineteen Fifties the REPUBLICANS pushed with the help of the faculty lunch software contained in the call of protection! they chanced on that a huge share of yankee schoolkids were turning out to be up malnourished and for this reason might want to be undeserving for military service, so as that they keen to feed them at school. (for sure, like food Stamps, yet another huge rationalization for this technique become to subsidize agribusiness). in addition they pushed with the help of a federal software to vaccinate children and many childhood ailments merely disappeared--smallpox and polio being the worst, now very almost thoroughly surprising. Medicare cares for the elderly and chronically ill. It has an same effects, an same shopper delight as commercial coverage at a lot decrease cost. We in user-friendly words have Medicare contained in the first position because the coverage organizations didn't want to annoy with those who honestly get sick, so we, the taxpayers, took them off their hands. yet when we merely accelerated Medicare to conceal everybody contained in the country lets get an same aspect of care we do now yet keep 1000's of billions a three hundred and sixty 5 days. Then there is unemployment, human beings repayment, incapacity coverage, and so on. All those structures artwork as anticipated. certain, there is a few fraud and waste, yet decrease than corresponding commercial structures, also more inexpensive overhead and extra effective authorities. oversight.
2016-12-03 04:47:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by schebel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you get on the net and google social security and see what it was designed to be. It was not meant to be a retirement fund that you Dems have turned it into. This has gotten us into more trouble and was never meant to subsidies you for the rest of your life. If you are collecting social security right now, you majorly missed the boat when you should have been building a nest egg by yourself and not be depending on the government to take care of you!
2007-01-29 03:33:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by tbird 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
poor granny took to much acid and now cant think clearly. The republicans and there spending are the problem, and most liberals I know have very good jobs. It's the republicans I know that dont have jobs or are working min wage jobs.
2007-01-29 03:35:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by paul 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The republicans and their deficit spending has forced the financial raiding of Social Security since Regan was in office.
You don't get Social Security for not working, you get it when you get old or your dependents get it when you die which ever comes first.
2007-01-29 03:29:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by sprcpt 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
yes and i am sorry for you because old poor folks don't deserve it. and people answering this, have more respect for the elderly!
2007-01-29 03:31:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe you should stop listening to conservative radio and experience real life.
2007-01-29 04:09:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by ecogeek4ever 6
·
1⤊
0⤋