Since last year's Congress voted for their own 7 pay raises last year would you consider them blocking??

Question

Would their blocking the raise of minimum wage, as the Republicans have been doing for 10 years, to a more realistic living wage, pure greed on their part?

By the way, Tbird, the Republicans just blocked that raise in minimum wage.

Answer 1

Of course it is pure greed and hypocrisy. The Republican-controlled Congress said their lives and quality of living was more important than the majority of Americans. That is why the current, Democratic-controlled Congress chose no further wage increases for members of Congress until the minimum wage in this country was raised first.

Answer 2

As most of you all know we are about to have the minimum wage increased from $5.15 per hour to $7.50 per hour. Now ask yourselves is this really happening or not. Well here is something to think about. The government could raise the minimum wage to $10.00 per hour and it would not affect allot of people.

Many of you may not realize this, but if a person works in an establishment where tips maybe collected from the customer. The establishment is only required, by law, to pay $3.19 per hour. It is up to the customer to make up the difference to reach that magical $5.15 per hour. Who wins in this situation, the establishment?

Also a person who works for an establishment, but is not considered a full time employer, that establishment is not required, by law, to pay minimum wage. There are currently thousands of people who work at entry level jobs whom you would think are making minimum wage but are making $4 and $5 per hour. The employer will not consider them full time employees so they get away from paying this so called minimum wage.

Now, I always say, do not complain if you do not have a solution to fix the problem. Here is the fix, period! If you want to have a true minimum wage increase. Then we need to get away from all these loop holes in the government and actually pay the people what we say we are going to. The year is 2007. I think it is time to get away from all these old laws that have been in the books for decades and start paying people what they are worth.

Right now all we are doing is rubbing mud in the face of every waiter, waitress, and part time help by telling them the minimum wage is now $7.50 per hour but you are still going to only get $3.19 per hour. Because that is what truly is the law.

So next time you go out to eat at a resterant, or have your groceries loaded in the car, ask that person if they are making the new minimum wage? I bet you will be in for a big surprise!

Answer 3

I definitely don't like the Congressional pay raises. They do not deserve it. Having said that, it must be made clear that raising minimum wage is very often harmful to small business owners and that is why Republicans don't like to make federally mandated raises. It is better if a business owner is forced to offer higher wages to attract better quality of workers (or any workers for that matter).

Answer 4

No, it's the result of Republicans actually understanding fundamental economics. Capital is finite. Small businesses (which make up over half of the jobs in this country) cannot simply pass the added costs along to the consumer like the big guys can. Therefore, a 41% raise in their loabor costs will have to be dealt with by shrinking that labor force. Congratualtions, your plan will manage to put more of the working poor out of work.

Answer 5

GrEEd, got that right. They say, "who cares, who makes minimum wage anyway"? Yep in the dark, as far as the general citizens life styles. Shame.

Answer 6

No, not greed at all. In fact, if you were interested in the least about the history of minimum wages and their impacts on the people they purport to help, you might actually find the fact they harm those people that need entry-level jobs the most.

But seeing that you rely on emotion and feeling, rather than facts, evidence or truth, it would be a waste of time to try to educate you.

Just like it would be a waste of time to try to get you to understand that the Federal government has no Constitutional authority to legislate wages in a work contract between 2 private parties.

Answer 7

This grew to become into the two factors of the aisle and not only the dems. Your question makes it sound like it grew to become into only the dems doing it. Did you examine the link you published? From the link: "Majority chief Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., labored to soft the way for the pay hike." feels like a bipartisan ingredient to me. quite of blaming one area of the aisle, attempt to seem at it greater objectively. that's the two events doing stuff like this. Do you compromise, then, with this democratic congressman? "I don’t think of that's the wonderful time for contributors of Congress to be allowing the pay develop to bypass via without even an up-or-down vote,” mentioned Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah. “we would desire to teach the american human beings we are prepared to make some sacrifices … that we understand there’s a warfare for some in on the instant’s economic gadget.” added, the way you word the question means that only the dems have been given it...that they 'gave it to themselves', whilst of direction, each and every physique serving in congress have been given the pay develop in spite of the realm of the aisle you're on. What say I? the two events are corrupt and this don't have happened. of direction, because of the fact the object you appropriate to mentions, congresspeople meet with lobbyists who make a lot greater effective than they do daily. that still needs to alter. we would desire to get the enormous dollars out of politics so the publics superb interest is served, and not only those with the $$. So...i could only ask which you attempt to color a real photograph...that a democratically controlled homestead surpassed the COLA via bipartisan agreements that gave a develop to ALL who serve in congress. the two events are to blame.

Answer 8

not only that, but they fought against working more than 15 hours a week! Yes, greed...

Answer 9

Greed on their part.....