I write what makes the movie work, where the movie failed and what the viewer can expect without giving away too much of the plot.
if the film is really close to another film, I would cite that, so they know i am aware that this is a retelling of "Romeo and Juliet" for example
2007-01-29 02:22:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I like reading the movie reviews in the newspaper, and the good ones seem to have these things in common:
1. Give the premise of the movie without giving away any serious spoilers
2. Point out the movie's strongest points (assuming you liked something about it)
3. Point out any major flaws (bad acting, nonsensical storyline, predictability)
4. Mention similar films, if you can think of any
5. If you think the movie is one people should see, explain why it's not only good but possibly important
Check out www.reelviews.net, the guy who writes for that site is pretty sharp. He'd be a good role model.
2007-01-29 02:23:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by MikeTX 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
"Christian" web content are many times very biast and hardly examine. you'll only get to fee PG-13 videos at a max until eventually it has to do with Jesus. Rotten Tomatoes allow you to evaluate them in case you signal in and refer to them. Your community newspaper allow you to evaluate them once you're good.
2016-10-16 06:18:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
* look the story and analyse it
*look the script and sceans
*look how the director presented the story
*At last the acting of the persons
2007-02-06 00:46:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sreekanth M 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
WATCHTHE MO0VIE THEN TELL WHAT YOU LIKED AND WHAT YOU DIDN'T LIKE ABOUT THE MOVIE.
2007-01-29 02:20:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by wil_t52 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
dont know
2007-02-05 04:15:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋