2007-01-29 02:01:53 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I have to say he gets a big fat "F" for both. He fails miserably as president.
2007-01-29 02:06:07 · answer #1 · answered by courage 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Domestic.
Stock market is up, unemployment at its lowest level. Home ownership at record levels. Oil coming back down. GDP at record levels, deficit much lower than expected. Interest rates low and inflation is in check. How is he NOT doing a good job here.
He does a terrible job of highlighting these accomplishments.
Foreign policy? Things could be going better, but he is doing better than his predacessors save for Reagan.
2007-02-02 07:30:12 · answer #2 · answered by adreed 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Domestic. Low unemployement, growing stock market(with no fake growth like the internet bust and energy/communications fraud), housing market, Lower taxes, higher tax revenue, small business growth all better than under Clinton. Numbers don't lie. Bush's forgien policy is lacking. And thats being nice about it.
2007-01-29 10:28:23 · answer #3 · answered by Mazlow01 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Neither. He does a lousy job with both. It's very difficult to estimate the damage done by wrong policies in each area.
2007-01-29 10:12:08 · answer #4 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
His foreign policies have helped contribute to domestic safety and security, so I would say foreign policy.
2007-01-29 10:17:12 · answer #5 · answered by jh 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
none of the above
2007-01-29 10:06:54 · answer #6 · answered by ken y 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
That's like asking which feces smells better, dog or cat.
2007-01-29 10:10:02 · answer #7 · answered by lunatic 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Hahahahahahahahahaha. Ur so funny today. Ur so bright, no wonder the sun hasn't come out.
2007-01-29 10:07:00 · answer #8 · answered by Constitution 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Neither.
2007-01-29 10:05:15 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Neither LOL!!
2007-01-29 10:45:54 · answer #10 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋