...and don't give me more Republican Rhetoric that he hasn't done anything illegal, because he HAS done far more illegal things than Richard (I am not a crook) Nixon and Ronald (I don't recall) ever did.
2007-01-29 02:01:47 · 31 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First of all, the man lied to take this country to al illegal and immoral war that has now cost America more than any dollar's worth. He has cost us the lives of more than 3,000 young Americans.
2007-01-29 02:09:19 · update #1
I can't think of any good reasons or bad ones. Lets get started with the impeachment proceedings right away.
2007-01-29 02:07:27 · answer #1 · answered by courage 6 · 3⤊ 9⤋
No there is no valid reason why they both should not be Impeached. The list of crimes is very long. Sept. 11th. was the greatest failure of our Government to protect Americans in our History. If Bush were a CEO in any major Corporation, he would already be gone for that failure. The bigger questions are. Do Democrats have the courage to do what is best for America? Will Democrats do the will of the people? Will Democrats honor the Oath they took "to protect and defend the Constitution" they took this oath before God and Country?
2007-01-29 02:23:58 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
For years we have turned and hid as others have bombed and mamed people and all are non military targets . Each time they get worse and 911 was the worst. Bush and Cheney stood up to protect our rights to leave these little notes. Now you want us to put our tail between our legs and hide again. Your probably the to let someone beat you down and not do anything about it so they continue to beat you. If you don't like it here go to another country and see how much more danger you'll live in. No one likes war not even Bush but there comes a time to act and that was back when Mrs. Clinton was running the country Bill coudn't stand up to her let alone another country, if he had maybe 911 wouldn't have happened. Bottom line is we were attacked and lost more AMERICANS than at Pearl Harbour and they were not military!!!
2007-01-29 02:27:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
too expensive. That is theonly good reason, and considering the reps found investigating Clinton to be a good enough reason to waste the tax payers dollars and time, I think the dems will act smarter. Impeachment is an investigation. That is when you find the high crimes. It would be impossible to say what those crimes are, without investigating. Impeachment would be necessary to find the truth behind millions of missing dollars in rebuilding Iraq, the reasons for going to war, implementing the 9/11 commission's findingd, the blatant constitutional violations Bush swore to uphold, etc... But to answer the question, money is a good reason to let it go.
2007-01-29 02:13:33 · answer #4 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Because there hasn't been a proper investigation. It needs to be bipartisan because if Bush has committed in impeachable offense then the only way to get republican support is determine if there is evidence that even they can't refute.
2007-01-29 02:10:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
No there is no good reason why they shouldn't be impeached. Stupid spolit brats trying to make other countries worse than they already are. Liars and hypocritical to their citizens. It's all about power and oil.
2007-01-29 02:41:21 · answer #6 · answered by In-Sync 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
today, the House of Reps mostly control the country. So before you go blaming Bush for all of it, go complain about it to your local congressman. If you dont like this greatest country in the world that we call home, move to canada.
2007-01-29 13:17:32 · answer #7 · answered by NASCAR fan 8_17_20_99 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES...
It's not rhetoric... you haven't listed a single item that meets the Constitutional criterea for impeachment.
Interesting that you say that "lying" is a crime... strange that Dems didn't consider it a crime for William J.
I'd LOVE for a Democrat to actually POST some charges... otherwise it's all just HOT AIR
2007-01-29 02:37:02 · answer #8 · answered by mariner31 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No they should not and will not be impeached.
Whenever a Republican is in office there will always be threats of impeachment, this is the liberals way of trying to get back for Slick Willie's impeachment.
2007-01-29 02:18:04 · answer #9 · answered by georgewallace78 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Oh, please. I've gone to the sites that are all about impeaching President Bush, I've read their "reasons", and they're all half-truths and distortions.
So no, he hasn't done anything impeachable.
"Illegal and immoral war?" It is not illegal, nor is it immoral, because there's no such thing as a "moral" war. In order for it to be immoral, there would have to be such a thing as a "moral" war. And how do you know it was lies? Weapons were found.
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2006/06/iraq-060629-afps02.htm
2007-01-29 02:05:52 · answer #10 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 12⤊ 4⤋
There is THE number one reason that he should not be impeached, and that is what you said, He has NOT done anything illegal, nor can you PROVE he has!!!!!
Blind accusations and half truths are not good enough
Let me guess, you will accuse him of "illegal wiretaps". Every president has done that, AND HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DO IT, since WWII. IT IS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY! HE IS NOT LISTENING IN ON YOUR BIRTHDAY CALL FROM YOUR GRANDMOTHER!
Then you will say something about "illegal war". CONGRESS APPROVED THE ACTIONS IN IRAQ. DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AGREED. YOUR DEMOCRATS ARE NOW CHANGING SIDES FOR POLITICAL REASONS. THEY DON'T CARE HOW MANY SOLDIERS LIVES IT COSTS!
2007-01-29 02:12:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋