Make a proof by contradiction: suppose that there is an n such that n^2=3k+2. Decompose n as n=3p+q, with q being 0, 1 or 2 (rest of the division by 3).
Then 3p^2+6pq+q^2 = 3k+2 that I can rewrite as: 3(p^2+2q-k) = 2-q^2.
This implies that 2-q^2 should be a multiple of 3. But that's not the case for q=0, 1 or 2.
2007-01-29 03:22:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by chaps 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every number must be of the form 3a+0, 3a+1 or 3a+2 for some a. All we're saying here is that a number must have a remainder of 0, 1 or 2 when divided by 3.
If a number of the form 3a+0 is squared, it gives another number of the form 9a² which is of the form 3b for some b. This can not be expressed as 3k + 2.
If a number of the form 3a+1 is squared, work out what form it must be in.
Do the same for 3a+2. It's easy, then, to show that none of them will give a number of the form 3k+2.
2007-01-29 01:55:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gnomon 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm assuming you mean any integer k, because if k=2/3, then 3k+2 = 3(2/3)+2 = 2+2 = 4.
2007-01-29 01:54:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris S 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Squrroot( k ) = 3k + 2
k = 9ksqur + 12k + 4
0 = 9ksqur + 11k + 4
Since everything is positive and the vertex starts on the 4 mark on the Y axis. It never touches the X axis when equivilent to 0. Thus, there is no solution.
2007-01-29 01:56:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by jpferrierjr 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
could be forty 9, (x + 7) situations (x + 7) divide your b term in 0.5 and sq. it to return up with the respond. watch your signs and indicators additionally, those are all effective so its advantageous. If it reported x2 + 14x - ok then there does not be a real answer. n
2016-12-17 05:01:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What with induction?? Ha, I could NEVER do that. Good luck though.
2007-01-29 02:03:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋