I dont get what the difference is-
Bottom line is with gays, straights, and lesbians you just stick something somewhere.
So if thats the way u feel your question should be why have sex when its so unnatural
2007-01-29 01:53:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hey Electric, when nature and God have provided you with a loving nature, why this unnatural act of preaching hatred and bigotry against LGBT people?
We all know that God makes LGBT (and straight people) just exactly as they are, but you have to LEARN how to hate. So who taught you this unnatural hatred - your family? Your church?
Being LGBT is not 'unnatural.' Being filled with hate is.
2007-01-29 03:59:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Perhaps you should spend a little less time mouthing off and try understanding what "natural" means; Of, relating to, or concerning nature.
In a nut-shell, it's what is performed in nature, therefore, homosexuality in quite natural, in fact so is hermaphroditism [look it up if you don't want to be ignorant for the rest of your life].
Heterosexuality isn't "normal", just "common".
2007-01-29 04:15:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by PJW 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's not actually unnatural. You see it in animal communities too. And you don't know what you are missing. Someone of the same sex knows your body so much more than someone of the opposite sex. You sound like an ignorant bigot, though, so I shant bother to write any more.
2007-01-29 05:42:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by helen g 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I take it you deem it unnatural because it doesn't a) appeal to you and b) involve making babies?
Well that it shouldn't appeal to you doesn't make it any less fun for those that enjoy it - and when was sex only ever about making babies?
2007-01-29 02:30:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by unclefrunk 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Love is love. Whether it is for your Mum and Dad, your siblings or friends of both sexes. It is what binds us together. Sex is a close friend of love
2007-02-01 21:34:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Professor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, I do not know why all of you heterosexuals continue having sex, it seems so unnatural to me. Why would a man want to be with a woman. You have to deal with the risk of pregnancy, they think differently than guys (very confusing) and they do not know how to please a guy. It just seems so pointless.
Gay sex on the other hand is awesome! No risk of pregnancy, guys think like guys and who knows better what feels good to a man than another man!
And the same goes for girl on girl! No risk of pregnancy, gals think like gals and who knows better what feels good to a gal than another gal!
2007-01-29 01:50:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tegarst 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
The purpose of nature is to create the next generation,so do not
lay the provision at nature's door-maybe nurture,not nature
By the way,I am neither pro- or con
2007-01-29 01:47:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by aburobroy 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
Hey, poor speller, why this loaded question? Applies to you
2007-01-29 07:56:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Raymo 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nature gave us stones so that we might have fun hurling them at each other. Mankind took those stones, extracted oar, and built airplanes so that we would have much more fun.
Must we always limit ourselves to that which is "natural"?
2007-01-29 03:55:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Joe L 1
·
2⤊
2⤋