English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-29 01:23:10 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

I heard of theory that we are able to go back to our past life or our future just by entering the black hole. How true was that and what's the scientific explanation?

2007-01-29 01:26:12 · update #1

21 answers

could be true never know you could a worm hole to a whole new dimension

2007-01-29 01:30:49 · answer #1 · answered by GQsmooth 3 · 0 1

before anyone can say anything, people have to find a way to overcome the intense gravity, pull, power and strangeness of the black hole! you would be ripped to peices so it would take a long time before you can even think about going back in time! Maybe it is possible maybe it isnot but no one can no for sure! I am more interested in where the stuff gets deposited later! Does it come out of hte back end of a black hole or disapear or enter a new galaxy! Very interesting!

2007-01-29 01:39:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Black Holes are only theoretical entities, they have been theorized but never really observed.

What you ask is conceptually an exaggeration of the fact that at the boundary of a black hole (its Event Horizon) time seems to slow down from the perspective of someone that is falling into the black hole and is looking at an object on the outside (since his speed gets closer and closer to the speed of light, Special Relativity kicks in).

Other problems with going in a black hole is that there is an immense gravity that will crush everything going in.

2007-01-29 01:34:52 · answer #3 · answered by Christian M 1 · 2 0

Yes and no. Scientists have a feel about time being slowed or
accelerated. They could be referring to our consciousness of
time rather than time as measured according to the orbit of the
earth around the sun - 24 hour-day, 365 and a quarter day for
one orbit round the sun.

If the whole solar system enter a blackhole the whole system may
survive and lives intact. But if we left earth in a spacecraft then we
moved out of the system of earth then we must know the system
beyond earth in order to survive.

So when protected by earth which then is protected by the solar
system and we entered a blackhole, then the view would
changed. But we would hardly noticed it because of the vastness.

But we don't get younger and diamonds won't become trees
again.

2007-01-29 02:00:25 · answer #4 · answered by wcsj 2 · 0 0

The gravity is so intense that light cannot escape. So where does everything sucked into a black hole go? Is it possible that it keeps getting denser and denser? Or does it pass through a sort of worm hole? It would rip everything apart to its sub-atomic particles, so there is now way to ever send something through and retrieve any information from it.

2007-01-29 01:36:30 · answer #5 · answered by Elwood P. Dowd 2 · 0 0

That is pure science fiction. Truth be told, scientists have no idea what happens in a black hole, but at the event horizon any object is crushed down to the size of a molecule, so you would not survive, even if you could make that far.

2007-01-29 01:33:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I doubt it. Seeing how a black hole swallows up anything in its wake. if you went into it you would never be released from it to go into your past. A black holes gravity is so intense that it will not even release light. If you maintained any type of sanity or if you were even alive after entering the event horizon you would be stuck in eternal darkness.

2007-01-29 01:31:14 · answer #7 · answered by answerman 3 · 0 0

People can make up any theory they like, especially if there is a movie script to encourage them.

;-D There is no evidence that a Black Hole goes back in time.

2007-01-29 01:56:01 · answer #8 · answered by China Jon 6 · 0 0

Not true. Even if the theories about space-time are correct, you could not survive entering into a black hole. Gravity and tidal forces would rip you apart.

2007-01-29 01:29:40 · answer #9 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1 0

The possibility of black holes does exist is well supported by astronomical observation, particularly from studying X-ray emission from X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei. It has also been hypothesized that black holes radiate an undetectably small amount of energy due to quantum mechanical effects. This is called Hawking radiation. The possibility of going back is time is through the use of worm holes. Worm holes are hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is essentially a "shortcut" through space and time. A wormhole has at least two mouths which are connected to a single throat. If the wormhole is traversable, matter can 'travel' from one mouth to the other by passing through the throat. While there is no observational evidence for wormholes, spacetimes containing wormholes are known to be valid solutions in general relativity.
The name "wormhole" comes from an analogy used to explain the phenomenon. If a worm is travelling over the skin of an apple, then the worm could take a shortcut to the opposite side of the apple's skin by burrowing through its center, rather than travelling the entire distance around, just as a wormhole traveller could take a shortcut to the opposite side of the universe through a hole in higher-dimensional space. A wormhole could allow time travel. This could be accomplished by accelerating one end of the wormhole to a high velocity relative to the other, and then sometime later bringing it back; relativistic time dilation would result in the accelerated wormhole mouth aging less than the stationary one as seen by an external observer, similar to what is seen in the twin paradox. However, time connects differently through the wormhole than outside it, so that synchronized clocks at each mouth will remain synchronized to someone traveling through the wormhole itself, no matter how the mouths move around. This means that anything which entered the accelerated wormhole mouth would exit the stationary one at a point in time prior to its entry. For example, if clocks at both mouths both showed the date as 2000 before one mouth was accelerated, and after being taken on a trip at relativistic velocities the accelerated mouth was brought back to the same region as the stationary mouth with the accelerated mouth's clock reading 2005 while the stationary mouth's clock read 2010, then a traveler who entered the accelerated mouth at this moment would exit the stationary mouth when its clock also read 2005, in the same region but now five years in the past. Such a configuration of wormholes would allow for a particle's world line to form a closed loop in spacetime, known as a closed timelike curve.

It is thought that it may not be possible to convert a wormhole into a time machine in this manner: some analyses using the semiclassical approach to incorporating quantum effects into general relativity indicate that a feedback loop of virtual particles would circulate through the wormhole with ever-increasing intensity, destroying it before any information could be passed through it, in keeping with the chronology protection conjecture. This has been called into question by the suggestion that radiation would disperse after traveling through the wormhole, therefore preventing infinite accumulation. The debate on this matter is described by Kip S. Thorne in the book Black Holes and Time Warps. There is also the Roman ring, which is a configuration of more than one wormhole. This ring seems to allow a closed time loop with stable wormholes when analyzed using semiclassical gravity, although without a full theory of quantum gravity it is uncertain whether the semiclassical approach is reliable in this case.

2007-01-29 01:32:57 · answer #10 · answered by Dhan Louie ☺ 2 · 2 1

properly you need to purchase the certainty that that it is impossible (on the least for now) you would be stretched and squeezed on the very edge of the black hollow, by skill of the time you have been interior the black finished, you're able to exceedingly lots be a singularity. additionally i consider the different approximately its no longer YOUR concept, for sure because of the fact I even have heard it earlier yet secondly because of the fact your grammer and punctuation is appalling!

2016-11-28 02:42:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers