2007-01-29 00:37:04 · 10 answers · asked by srini562002 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
beyond the fact that certain rights are tied to "marriage" it does not have much significance at all. The heterosexual people ruined it themselves a long time ago.
For some reason loving gay couples ruin marriage, whereas adultery and divorce are perfectly fine.
2007-01-29 00:43:51 · answer #1 · answered by Tegarst 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Marriage is only a contract between two or more people.
It has the same usefulness now as it always has.
The difference now is that the contracts are easily broken. in many nations.
It comes down to those involved in the contract if it is of any value or not.
Personaly I will never have such a contract.
2007-01-29 08:44:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not really no. Though it does keep the divorce lawyers in buisness. So I guess in that sense it has relevance...
2007-01-29 09:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by Yoda Greene 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-01-29 08:41:24 · answer #4 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For those that buy into it and want to confer legal rights to their partner, then yes.
2007-01-29 10:40:12 · answer #5 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its totally relevant for the people who want to do it, but its not for everyone I guess. I personally am happy to be married.
2007-01-29 08:44:45 · answer #6 · answered by donnyschick33 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It does according to divorce lawyers!
2007-01-29 11:30:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course, maybe not the blessing by God Aura, but it's the custom most people follow.
2007-01-29 08:42:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you keep homosexuals away from marriage, of course its relevant because it produces families.
2007-01-29 08:41:44 · answer #9 · answered by charles 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Refills please.
2007-01-29 08:41:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋