i mean, the sex tourist is providing good income for the person selling the sex. in poor countries like thailand, many individuals and families are enjoying a much higher income and standard of living because of sex tourism. yet the men who pay these women their wages are criticised as being "dirty" / perverted / exploitative, etc. how can this be the case between two consenting adults who are both getting what they want /need out of the arrangement? how else would poor women feed their kids + families without sex tourism?
2007-01-29 00:29:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Sociology
Well this is a first for me. Why would you want to have sex with someone who is just with you to be paid? What happened with meeting someone on vacation and having a fling???? Do you have to target some poor woman who has to have sex in order to feed her kids?????????? Call me old fashion, but with all the diseases going around there is not enough money in this world that would entice me to take that chance. For certain they must have brothels in most countries where the prostitutes are checked medically and take proper precautions. Why not donate money to some poor family you meet along the way?? Why must you have sex with the mother of these poor children so they can have a meal while in return you take the chance of some horrific STD?????????
2007-01-29 09:28:04 · answer #1 · answered by truckermate 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, these poor women must stop having kids, so she doesn't have to do this. If selling sex is openly allowed, is it okay for these women to work at home, in front of their kids? Would these women want their kids to do what they are doing when the kids grow up? If they must survive, they must, but why would anyone put themselves to be in the situation where you have to support their kids alone. If this is by choice, then they should be proud of their job, teach their own children how to be a prostitute.
2007-01-29 02:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by Pluto 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess the question that has smth to do with morality is always complicated to solve. In this case, the morality of people has long been influenced by the Catholic rules. Even too long. As a result about 80 percent of people (I dare to count approx.) still think of sex as an unclean, low-level thing and they simply don't want to see good things in it. So they "calculate": "dirrty" sex + commerce (this was also long considered "low" activity) = WRONG!!! I think it's smth like that.
2007-01-29 02:40:36 · answer #3 · answered by Aatami 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree totally. the problem is within the Puritanical ideal that sex is dirty, even somehow between a man and wife. Walk in on your parents and see if things will ever be the same again!! No they won't!!!...because sex is evil!! It was neccesary when they were trying to have babies, but even then it was something you just don't talk about....SSSSHHH!
2007-01-29 01:19:08 · answer #4 · answered by stringer_G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋