Who agrees that Bush's strategies are good ones?

Question

You know, there sure is a lot of opposition to the Iraq war these days. Where is it all coming from? Sure, I understand that Iraqis aren't ready for democracy because they've been warring with each other for thousands of years, but you just have to give Bush's strategy some time. Iraqis are getting wasted by the falaffel-shop-full, and once they're all dead, there will be no one left in Iraq to bungle up a democracy there. It's plain to see this strategy will be effective.

Bush has also made advancements in nuclear non-proliferation. By provoking North Korea to conduct a nuclear test explosion, he's managed to reduce the amount of radioactive material that Kim Jong-il has to blow us up with! And our dealings with that regime send a clear message to Iran: Mess with us, and we'll stop being friends with you!

This is unmistakeable proof that Bush is the best President of the United States in the whole wide world!!!

Answer 1

Oh well given your unmistakeable proof you are clearly right.
Bush is a brilliant President. I never saw the genius in waiting it out till all Iraqis are dead. There is a definate advantage to that though. No one left to oppose us.

I mean as far as Iran goes who really wants to be friends with them anyway, I heard they pee in the sandbox.

Answer 2

Hey Clyde, there is only one President in the whole wide world – and he is an idiot. Even his own father said that invading Iraq would be a failure and that America would lose (read his 1998 book, ‘A World Transformed’ for his detailed reasoning). Colin Powell told the President, ‘if you break it, you own it’.

And then there were these people who have been proven to have been right all along and the real defenders of America:

Representative Ike Skelton, September 2002:
“I have no doubt that our military would decisively defeat Iraq’s forces and remove Saddam. But like the proverbial dog chasing the car down the road, we must consider what we would do after we caught it.”

Al Gore, September 2002:
“I am deeply concerned that the course of action that we are presently embarking upon with respect to Iraq has the potential to seriously damage our ability to win the war against terrorism and to weaken our ability to lead the world in this new century.”

Barack Obama, now a United States senator, September 2002:
“I don’t oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.”

Representative John Spratt, October 2002:
“The outcome after the conflict is actually going to be the hardest part, and it is far less certain.”

Representative Nancy Pelosi, now the House speaker-elect, October 2002:
“When we go in, the occupation, which is now being called the liberation, could be interminable and the amount of money it costs could be unlimited.”

Senator Russ Feingold, October 2002:
“I am increasingly troubled by the seemingly shifting justifications for an invasion at this time. … When the administration moves back and forth from one argument to another, I think it undercuts the credibility of the case and the belief in its urgency. I believe that this practice of shifting justifications has much to do with the troubling phenomenon of many Americans questioning the administration’s motives.”

Howard Dean, then a candidate for president and now the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, February 2003:
“I firmly believe that the president is focusing our diplomats, our military, our intelligence agencies, and even our people on the wrong war, at the wrong time. … Iraq is a divided country, with Sunni, Shia and Kurdish factions that share both bitter rivalries and access to large quantities of arms.”


http://donkeyod.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/they-told-you-so/

Answer 3

I agree with you completely! I just feel sad that this President is trying to do his job amidst so much hatred and put downs. It's a tough enough job w/o having libs tearing at your heels everyday. But, of course, those people wouldn't attempt to help out the situation.

Answer 4

The ones that lose the 2008 election.

Answer 5

Bush is an idiotic narrow minded out of touch president and the polls prove thats what the overwelming majority of Americans feel! Gee another level one questionare, no I did not say troll out loud!

Answer 6

Nothing about Bush is good.

Answer 7

Boy are you misinformed.

Answer 8

idiot