English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or a stronger America under George W. Bush?

2007-01-28 22:59:57 · 9 answers · asked by americanmalearlington 4 in News & Events Other - News & Events

newton2ii . you should really read the question and try to understand it before you attemt to answer.

2007-01-29 18:56:21 · update #1

My future questions will be simpler so Dems will have a better chance of understanding it.

2007-01-29 19:04:29 · update #2

9 answers

No coincidence but don't tell the liberals or the haters, you'll only confuse them with the truth.

2007-01-28 23:07:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

9/11 shouldn't have happend and it was the fault of all the governments since the 70's. They islamic fundamentalists know that america is morally weak and proof of it was when rushdie was threatened by the ayatollah and nothing was done about it. Bush is just as Guilty. He is so morally uncomfortable that he cannot seek justice rather he has to justify the war not as "justice" but as "we must bring democracy to the middle east" . Every day that you allow regimes such as Iran to exist, you only allow the enemy to get stronger.

Here is the answer more eloquently put.

http://www.peikoff.com/essays/end.htm

2007-01-29 07:04:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Oh, so you're pretending that the attacks on the London subways and Madrid train DIDN'T happen? Or are you claiming that they weren't perpetrated by Al Qaeda supporters?

Or worst of all, you probably don't give a rat's behind who gets killed as long as it's not more yanks.

There HAVE BEEN attacks, chump. Just because they didn't happen on US soil doesn't mean people weren't killed...unless of course, one takes the idiotic attitude that non-yanks aren't human.


.

2007-01-29 10:01:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if there was no bush in the beginning..there would have been no attacks! Never a coincidence

2007-01-29 09:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by pinkish ;) 2 · 1 0

I say "stronger America" and luck, but mostly just vigilance that the Democrats are trying to weaken.

2007-01-29 13:56:22 · answer #5 · answered by Steve H 2 · 1 1

There's been no further attacks on U.S. soil because we have the dumbest President in history. The terrorists knew they could goad him into fighting the wrong people in the wrong country and he has thus allowed the terrorists to have home court advantage.

2007-01-29 07:15:54 · answer #6 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1 2

good move by Bush to move the fight off of our soil. And God bless the men and women serving in the US military.

2007-01-29 07:08:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

coincidence,all targets hit ,but one,the white house//////staged////come on now//////why didnt they drop on the

2007-01-29 07:47:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

bush made 9 / 11 TO ATTACK IRAQ AND MIDDLE EAST

2007-01-29 07:10:42 · answer #9 · answered by JC 1 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers