Government hasn't payed me the 200K federaliez's reward nor for National Treasure movie, yet, so I think I should sell North Dakota to the highest bidding French Canadian.
North Dakota has the least violence per capita and doesn't help the rest of US. They speak French, "Aaaah". The federal government tried to straighten them out years ago by placing monuments, it never worked. They can't play baseball.
If I sell North Dakota to a French Canadian I can drive the Bloody British out of Pennsylvania once and for all! Added benefit is by getting rid of North Dakota WE can obtain a star for The Monarchy of Pennsylvania and WE will not have to do any sewing.
2007-01-28 17:54:01 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
NO,
#1- It could mean we need passports to drive cross country.
#2- We would have to send all the American flags back to China to have a star removed
#3- Canada's not that great. Look at al their geese that winter here. Don't you think you should find out why so many don't go back before selling ND to one of them?
#4- We would have a country with nuclear weapons in the middle of the USl
#5- Since we would have to count all the people who now leave ND to find jobs (everyone born since 1940) our immigration problem would be worse then ever.
#6 Their state bird, the meadow lark is completely unprepared to move up to the role of a national bird. The trauma of such a promotion without preperation would have devasting results, including causing the little songbirds to have a nervous breakdown. Can you imagine waking up to the sounds of thousands of nervous meadow larks with a stuttering problem? Just as we spent millions on Japan following ww2 congress would allow our national guilt to approve unlimited spending for therapists from the animal planet tv channel to repair the songbirds stuttering problem we caused by selling ND aqnd making them feel unneeded.
#7 Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico have more people moving in every year. Although they are curenttly our first choice as a nuclear waste dump ND, starved for federal funds and with less and less people that vote is a good option for this in the future. Selling ND now would be like throwing out a stinkey trash can you might need later.
#8-10 Each year, many bikers who's maps are sucked up and blew away after being passed semis were trying to find Sturgis. They often end up lost in ND instead. They will be even more po'ed when they find out they are in another country. If let back in they will be a force with an attitude no one will want to face
No, selling ND would not be prudent at this time.
2007-01-28 19:44:09 · answer #1 · answered by always fishing 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hahahaha, you really think you could find a buyer? look i've been to north dakota, don't lay that on me. i understand the state government will pay you to live in north dakota. laws been on the books several years, no takers. get what you can from this french canadian and run.
2007-01-29 02:08:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are monuments in N. Dakota???
2007-01-29 02:03:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the price is right , leave Sturgis tho.
2007-01-29 02:01:50 · answer #4 · answered by pompanopete0 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you find a buyer, please see if they're also interested in buying my half of the Brooklyn Bridge.
2007-01-29 02:35:11 · answer #5 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋