English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've seen several posts where people justify an attack on Iran as revenge for their attack on 9-11.

2007-01-28 17:10:14 · 15 answers · asked by bettysdad 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Hm, no. There wasn't an Iranian terrorist on those planes, nor was it funded nor influenced in anyway from Iran. They still hate our guts and anyone Jewish and is still making nuclear weapons as reason unknown (but we have a good idea). But they have never attacked us (during 9/11, I don't know about Iraq, they have many "non-alligned" agents there).Those people most have been extremely misinformed.

2007-01-28 17:21:31 · answer #1 · answered by Eh? 2 · 0 1

Please I don't understand? Iran supported the Osama and they have been our enemy since the coup of the Shah? Oil or no Oil there is no reason to support terrorism? You do not have to be the one to pull the trigger to be the murderer? They also are the Hezbollah, do you know that most of them in Lebanon were Iranians? Iraq trained the terrorists there and hid them as well as Yemen, and Pakistan, Libya, and Syria. This is fact. Do you get it that it doesn't matter about the name to blame it is a team effort? They just hate us and that is it . You cannot count the Islamics born here and the ones that have been in America and Americanized? But then you might be able to link them too?
Osama went to school here as many others. There argument in their religious beliefs is their mission and look they are killing each other for the argument over the same Bible? You cannot trust them at all . Would you turn your back on a coiled Rattle Snake? Well then? I don't care what Bush did or didn't do?
We will sort that all out amongst ourselves and he will get it later. Right now we need to kick their butts back in the sand and free up our country again so we are not over powered by martial law and the Congress goes Socialist? Get it. Take care of your own.

2007-01-28 19:33:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. I believe that Israel should launch an offensive pre-emptive strike against selected targets to eradicate the nuclear program and destroy their arsenal. The possibility of any loss of soldier and civilian life must be speculated on and they must plan for minimal to no loss of life, carefully and strategically altering their plan to meet these requirements. It is important to direct military policy towards being a second or third solution, in light of the failure in Lebanon that didn't change anything about the situation and resulted in the loss of 1,500 civilians. Of course, Hezbollah mixed in with the civilians, NATO did not help and the Israeli government did not plan their military offensive well...also, the Lebanese government stood by and did nothing, not imposing a curfew or offering assistance or bolstered security for the people..creating a needless situation...

2007-01-28 17:49:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I haven't seen much of that. What I do see is Bush setting us up for an attack on Iran. In his apology speech he warned Iran he will go after them for their support of their fellow tribesmen in Iraq, and I think that means he will bomb them on the border, trying to provoke them into the greater war. So, it seems Bush is trying to link Iran to the war in Iraq as an excuse for bringing down Iran. It may be sloppy thinking that is tying the two together in the way you have noticed.

2007-01-28 17:53:14 · answer #4 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2 0

they did no longer have a damn ingredient to do with it. Bush invaded as pay back for the sick dwindled attempt on Bush Sr's existence. Rummy, Bush and Cheney have all admitted the Iraqis weren't in touch in 911. The used 911 as a manner in. the comprehensive invasion concern has been twisted and convoluted by using fact that day one. Now the escalation of enemy opponents in Iraq is yet another reason to no longer withdraw. they won't in any respect shop on with us back to the country. they don't have the technologies or logistics to combat us on our own soil.

2016-12-16 16:03:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

People are generally pretty gullible. Iran does make more sense than Iraq. But actually the real perpetrator lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. In Washington D.C.

2007-01-28 18:19:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

hahaha... how many country are on the list?

yeah people of "America" like to point their hands on others...

first Afghanistan, second Iraq, Third Iran?
give me a full list of country US want to attack..

why don't they attack Vietnam back..? for revenge.. all is for revenge... American does like revenge don't they? you American are so influenced by the television.. too much Rambo, too much Terminator, too many movie.

if they believe so much in Iran attack US 9/11... why don't they believe US govt. plot this whole thing using the CIA and FBI..?

2007-01-28 17:23:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I would hope not. The only terrorist group Iran supports is Hezbollah, and as far as I know, they are too busy attacking Israel, Lebanon, and helping the Shi'ia militias in Iraq.

2007-01-28 17:20:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

The Government knowing and willing let 9-11 happen.

2007-01-28 18:26:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Why not,hahaha lets get them and teach then a lesson!

2007-01-28 17:51:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers