Could it possibly be the fact that he has not committed any crimes, or is trying to pass a minimum wage increase more important? Any honest answers would be appreciated, thanks.
2007-01-28 14:08:05 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mr. Cracker, what is clear to everyone - what crimes that have been committed, or why no action has been taken by the new majority? Please enlighten me by elaborating on your answer, thanks.
2007-01-28 14:20:35 · update #1
He hasn't committed any crime - that's just angry talk because people don't like him
2007-01-28 14:45:53 · answer #1 · answered by Dizney 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Politics and reelection are more important than finding the truth.
We spent 50 million on the Impeachment of Clinton to find out about his humidor, but the Pelosi said Impeachment was off the table before she even swore in.
This is a wake-up for all Americans, not just one party. It was a clear violation of Constitutional and civil law to authorize a warrant-less wiretapping program.
Changing the program a couple of years into it after facing possible investigations does not make the program legal.
Most people do not seem to realize that the first half of impeachment is an INVESTIGATION done by the House of Representatives. Until the investigation is conducted, we will not be able to give any specifics of violations.
We, the American public have absolutely the least amount of accurate information. It is the duty of the Congress to initiate these proceedings.
If the investigation(s) reveal that there was no violation of the Constitution or civil law then that is that. If there was no or little wrongdoing, then, like with Clinton, the Senate will not take any action to remove the President.
Why this has not yet been initiated, I can not know. If it doesn't happen soon, candidate choice will be easy for me.
I will vote against every incumbent until we get a flush of our governmental toilet good enough to ensure some true representation.
We have one party with two different domestic policy wings. Both parties have the same foreign policy. They all protect each other and are more concerned with the next election and enhancing their positions than they are in fulfilling their Oaths of Office.
2007-01-28 22:53:41 · answer #2 · answered by Jack C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Allegedly. You have answered your own question. Every politician is a villian to his opponents and a saint to his supporters.
That is why democracy works. A politician who has no detractors mean that his opponents are six feet under or languishing in a dark cell.
History has recorded a list of them in Europe, Asia and South America who had no opponents. Their opponents were silenced.
2007-01-28 22:15:54 · answer #3 · answered by angstrom 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because no politician is going to put their neck out without concrete unmistakable proof.
To find that proof is difficult because so many people are involved with the cover-up.
The even larger implication is that in fact many from both parties may very well be involved.
This isn't something that only involves a small number of people it is a movement!
It even involves members of officials from other countries.
2007-01-28 22:14:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, all the things they passed in the first 100 hours that was important. The American people needs those things asap. Now, having a criminal as a president is very important. It will take up A LOT of time and resources to convict him. So, at this time there are MANY investigations going on. The check out this interesting article.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_rob_kall_051220_bush_s_criminal_2c_tox.htm
2007-01-28 22:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by Justin 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I don't think he has committed any crimes. However, I think his 'fast track free trade' authority and his signing memos are unconstitutional.
2007-01-28 23:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo the nut farms out to night.
2007-01-28 22:23:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We have a Democratic Representative that is still currently investigating Bush and his Administration's past actions and it will be brought forth in a full report...Rep.Waxman is the representative that is investigating and he is the only one that has the Subpoena powers to file charges and bring them to justice. I think Bush will have his day in Court and so will Cheney and the rest of them...
the Question I'm always asking myself...and others...."Why is Bush Still in power?"
2007-01-28 22:13:38 · answer #8 · answered by Rmprrmbouncer 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
There is no question that Bush has committed impeachable offenses, as well as war crimes.
Most Democrats feel it's better to have Bush in office, committing mistake after mistake and drag the GOP down into a very deep hole.
Unlike Republicans with Clinton, Democrats feel impeachment would polarize the country even more than it is now, and impeachment isn't worth the damage it would inflict on the people.
2007-01-28 22:14:33 · answer #9 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 3⤊ 7⤋
Well, Honey, only getting elected was important.
2007-01-28 22:19:40 · answer #10 · answered by LoneStar 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋