Hillary suggested that today:
"We expect him to extricate our country from this before he leaves office" in January 2009, the former first lady said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070128/ap_on_el_pr/clinton2008;_ylt=ArIeVliQtDOTYH0JpiKTh4oDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
2007-01-28 13:36:25 · 14 answers · asked by The Father of All Neocons 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Has she not been paying any attention to Bush over the past 6 years? "I'm the decider". "This won't be over until we achieve victory", etc. Does she not pick up the "stubborn" cues that he doesn't listen to other people? In fact, some times I think he likes to do the opposite of what everyone else wants so he'll probably dig in his (cowboy) heels even more!
2007-01-28 15:33:25 · answer #1 · answered by Karen 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this conflict is one which should be received. we ought to stay in it to win, or we will be battling on american soil. human beings want to end complaining about it and merely help the troops. have any of you accessible honestly talked to three of our servicemen from iraq? I actually have, and they tell a thoroughly diverse tale than what's on television. we are triumphing the conflict, notwithstanding it would want to require troop involvement for the subsequent 20 years. oh, and about scooter libby. he would have lied or he would have had a foul memory. even with the case, he become no longer the only which leaked the identity of the cia agent (honestly, she wasn't even undercover ---- this turned right into a huge gruesome witchhunt). clinton knowingly lied to a grand jury and now is hung on a pedestal by technique of the democrats ---he must have surely been in penal complicated if libby should be. please recognize the data earlier you answer!
2016-12-03 04:19:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's assuming an awfut lot about who the American people will elect. It's also totally ignoring the threat - which apparently Hilary is totally out to lunch on, or she expects victory before the elections, or she's just playing politics with our military's lives. I would guess the latter.
2007-01-28 14:23:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. What do you think the terrorists will do if we come home? Here's what will happen; They will FOLLOW US HOME AND KILL US!!! Would you like to see that happen right here on American streets? Or would you rather watch TV of it happening in Iraq to Iraqis?
And hill would say anything to get her crotchmouth publicity! She should extricate herself from American's rear ends and quit politics! But she's too power mad and obsessed with bringing America down to her level, on it's knees!
Dread be on us if she ever gets elected to any high office of power!
2007-01-28 16:41:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary just doesn't know how to confront terrorism she also just doesn't want the job she don't care about what happens after we pull out before we can control bagdag if that happens before this election the credit would go to Bush and that make the Democrats look bad. That's all they care about they are using the army for political gain.
2007-01-28 14:10:04 · answer #5 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, it would be nice to finish the job before she gets into office, but it is not as easy as all of that. Regardless of why we got into this in the first place, we are in it now. If we leave there will be worldwide implications, not just in the middle east. If we just leave to placate Clinton, we will be handing her a larger problem. Leaving before a secure Iraqi government can be put in place will initially put the entire middle east into conflict. This will cause a worldwide oil shortage, that oil shortage will raise gas prices to a level never before seen. This will cause worldwide hunger and homelessness. The deaths you now see in Iraq by people who have volunteered to serve, will pale in comparison to the widespread death of innocents due to hunger , crime, and terror.
Your little fantasy world is not as simple as you think.
2007-01-28 13:54:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thats just one of the countless self serving pontifications we'll be hearing from Queen Hillary over the upcoming months. And because she says it, her flunkies will lap it right up even though it will signal to the insurgents that they need only wait for 2 years before turning Iraq into a blood zone.
2007-01-28 14:05:07 · answer #7 · answered by Evita Rodham Clinton 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Who cares what Hillary has to say? Today it is one thing. Tomorrow it will be something else. Bush must pursue his policy until he is no longer in office otherwise he will let down all Americans who have been with him. He will also let America down.
2007-01-28 16:40:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. He shouldn't accomodate the next president. He should accomodate the American public. The troops should be withdrawn much earlier than that.
2007-01-28 15:22:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Prez.Bill Clinton didn't get the troops out of the Balkans before he left.
2007-01-28 13:56:01 · answer #10 · answered by Luchador 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋