English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If congress can get started with a prayer and the majority of the American people believe in God, then why don't they stand up for their rights to have prayer in the schools?

2007-01-28 13:09:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

why dont you just stop whinning and pray after school same differance . lol whats the point of praying at school ne ways

2007-01-28 13:12:36 · answer #1 · answered by Doss 2 · 3 1

Folks...you can pray any time any place. God knows your heart where ever you may be. You know this to be true. Public prayer is unecessary unless of course you want to ensure that all people pray the way you want them to.

And what prayer should that be?? Methodist (my preference), a Southern Baptist, a Lutheran, oh how about Catholic or a Jewish one....and God forbid a Muslim prayer...or Hindu...

You see that's why prayer was taken out of the schools...out of respect for the diversity of religious views that make up American Society.

I myself went to school in East Tennessee and we did have to pray every morning...like a bunch of little robots. Prayer should be something that comes from your heart to God...not something that society tells you to do at a given place and moment in time.

So give us a break and let the kids learn and if that isn't good enough then do like so many other evangelicals and home school your kids.

2007-01-28 14:53:22 · answer #2 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 1 0

I don't think prayer in schools is a right. Nor is it prohibited.

If you look at the First Amendment, it says:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

This essentially says there should be no federal laws either way. The federal government should stay out of telling people whether they can or cannot exercise religion (whether it be in public or private).

Prayer in schools in a strict sense is left up to majority rule in the local area, and does not violate the First Amendment, just like opening Congressional sessions with a prayer also does NOT violate the First Amendment.

I think it's that last part about "nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof" that most people tend to gloss over.

2007-01-28 13:26:38 · answer #3 · answered by johnlb 3 · 1 0

Most people think school prayer will infringe on the freedom of religion. What kind of prayer is prayed when you have Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Wiccans, Agnostics, and Atheists in the same group?

It is unreasonable to compromise everyone's values to come up with some bland prayer that will be acceptable to everyone.

The Catholic Church agrees with the U.S. Constitution as currently interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court and does not support "structured" prayer in public schools.

In the Vatican II document, Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae (Human Dignity), the Church states:

The human person has a right to religious freedom. This freedom means that all men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits.

Children will continue to privately pray before tests just like they always have.

With love in Christ.

2007-01-28 17:24:51 · answer #4 · answered by imacatholic2 7 · 2 0

There is a lot of ignorance in Christianity today. School is a time to learn and that is all. True Christians can pray anytime, anywhere at anytime "but" in secret.

Matthew 6:5 to 6:7

5 And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by men. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward.

6 But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

7 And in praying do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do; for they think that they will be heard for their many words.

2007-01-29 12:23:40 · answer #5 · answered by House Speaker 3 · 1 0

Just because the majority of the American people believe in God does not mean anything. The majority of American people used to believe in slavery too.

Go out on the playground and pray all you want, there is no one stopping you.

2007-01-28 13:16:27 · answer #6 · answered by nemesis_318 2 · 3 1

Excellent idea. In a democratic nation like the US, if the believers in the One True God peacefully raise their voice, the administration may satisfactorily listen.

2007-01-29 00:18:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

People are allowed to pray in schools. It's when the school TELLS kids to pray that the kids who DON'T believe in god get their rights infringed upon.

As to why we don't stand up for other rights, I have no idea. It doesn't make sense.

2007-01-28 13:12:37 · answer #8 · answered by PopeJaimie 4 · 1 1

There is "Supposed" to be a Separation in this Country of Church (any religion) and State. It's when You start breaking that rule, and start favoring one faiths beliefs and ideals over others, that people, as a whole, start to get pissed off. This is what will eventually break this country apart.

2007-01-28 13:13:09 · answer #9 · answered by M L 5 · 2 1

Charlton Hesston became an efficient recommend of our precise to undergo palms. He became waiting to champion the priority without turning out to be the priority. Even a number of those who go with strict gun controls have reported he became an adversary who ought to disagree with them without being ugly. Now it is a uncommon skills certainly! he's largely to blame for replacing the Hollywood-created stereotype of the gun proprietor as a cabin-living “redneck” who totes a gun even even as he is going to church. i recognize Heston did not go with the time of his lack of life, even though it comes at a time even as the splendid court is identifying the destiny of the second one modification, and his dignified advocacy may be an element interior the alternative maximum people are hoping for: “convinced!” i'm no longer too in touch about that telephone call at 3:00 interior the morning. i'm more desirable in touch about the knock on the door at 3:00 interior the afternoon even as a properly-purpose authorities agent is composed of deliver jointly my gun or the sound of breaking glass that would come each and every time a properly-armed offender makes a call to violate my Fourth modification precise to be secure in my domicile. I don’t believe maximum liberals hated Heston. a lot of them extremely agreed with him, even if it became no longer computer for them to assert so in public. on each and every occasion we've had a gun-suitable tragedy at a college or a cafe, many liberals have “united” with conservatives, libertarians and others even as they got here jointly -- which consists of interior the line at their community gun save. RIP, Mr. Heston. we ought to continually be threat-free now.

2016-10-16 05:52:51 · answer #10 · answered by pelt 4 · 0 0

Why should you force your religion on to others?
Why can't we have seperation of church and state and let people teach their own kids at home.
When a teacher starts teaching religion we no longer have freedom of religion. If she is a Babtist that is what she teaches.
If she is Catholic that is what she teaches.
What if the teacher is gay? Is that what you want your children taught? I say teach them at home.

2007-01-28 13:33:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers