When Hell freezes over, the oceans turn to dust, and the sun goes nova, I will still not vote for the snake!
2007-01-28 13:12:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thorbjorn 6
·
6⤊
6⤋
i'm! Edit: Moody pink, what Paul stated grew to become into commendable.. he's not blinded with the help of his social gathering association, he will propose the candidate who's maximum suitable FOR THIS united states of america.. not in basic terms as a results of fact they're a democrat or republican.. To the different claims that a number of you have made, isolationist? Paul helps unfastened commerce and managing situations with international kinfolk, sorry he has yet another answer, besides blowing up random worldwide places, sinking our financial device into debt, and letting harmless human beings die, international kinfolk isn't sturdy sufficient for you? it is to undesirable that's what our founding fathers recommended.. and btw, worldwide terrorism? Paul VOTED IN choose OF GOING INTO AFGHANISTAN AND looking OSAMA BIN encumbered.. He additionally helps the letters of Marque and Reprisal, to counter terrorism.. next time do a splash diagnosis earlier you're making defective accusations
2016-12-17 04:44:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by apollon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would rather tear out my brain stem, run to the nearest 4 way intersection and skip rope with it then vote for that wicked witch.
2007-01-28 19:48:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No I wouldnt. I think she would simply run the country based on her own stiff opinions and not consider what is in the country's best interest. Honestly I think Guliani is probably the best choice, he's proven himself under pressurre and proven that he thinks of his people, not just himself. I think its time people started looking at candidates based on their decisions, not party affiliations.
2007-01-28 15:23:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Domi 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes I am gonna vote for Hillary the country needs a president that actually went to college and learned some things beside that coke can get you high and if they can not take a pic of your face then you give them the moon to shoot
2007-01-28 13:11:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
3⤊
6⤋
Absolutely NOT !!
When I observed how she behaved when Pres. G.Bush gave his state of the union address last year I couldn't believe the way she was acting. Regardless of Bush- she came off as such an immature little snit.
I cringe everytime that I see her-she is such a phoney.
2007-01-28 13:30:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sailon 4
·
5⤊
4⤋
No, she scares me. She'll run under the old misleading slogans of the Dems. Health care and such. Master of the political smear campaign. She'll make promises that she'll never keep. In my opinion the Clinton's are bad for the country. She'll raise taxes. They feed corruption and make politics look bad. If we were in grade school they would need their bottoms spanked, mouths washed out with soap and sat in the corner!
2007-01-28 13:15:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
6⤊
4⤋
With such a dismal selection of possible GOP candidates lining up, it might be worth seeing her elected just to throw Monica Lewinsky back in her face.
2007-01-28 13:51:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Father of All Neocons 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
If she gets the democratic nomination, I sure will vote for her. It's time to get the republicans out of the white house.
2007-01-28 13:48:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by catfan 5
·
3⤊
5⤋
I would love to see women in office but I"m not because of her views on some things
I wish Condi would run then there not doubt I would vote for her!
2007-01-28 13:07:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by nottelling123 1
·
4⤊
5⤋