And if they did why didn't they speak out???
It's the same as Madam Cloe not telling us the planes were going to hit the WTC.
2007-01-28 12:48:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no they all got snookered.
2007-01-28 18:55:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a sad situation for every good American. Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for a fire to melt steel unless it is assisted by something like "oxygen/acetylene" Jet fuel or Kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors where the planes hit collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?
2007-01-28 21:11:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes the congressmen were red and blue when they knew that Bush was lying and conspiring yto go to war with Iraq.They did not speak out because they were ashamed that they had been cheated by Mr Bush.Bush is a great liar .
2007-01-28 21:12:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
According to many the poor innocent congresspeople were made to vote for the war and had no choice in the matter. It is just another case of shucking personal responsibility
2007-01-28 20:55:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
When the President said Saddam was developing Nuclear, Biological and other weapon programs, the congress believed him.
The presidents name? Bill Clinton on December 17, 1998.
2007-01-28 20:54:29 · answer #5 · answered by Christmas Light Guy 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey......windowlicker......get your facts straight. Bush wasn't lying. he was sold a bill of goods that he should not have nought. He is guilty of negligence, not of lying. Smarties like you are just trying to stir up the pot for no good reason.
2007-01-28 21:26:18 · answer #6 · answered by Beachman 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
your question has no answer because it makes no sense...was it also the same as clinton saying i did not have sex with that woman UNDER OATH TO A FEDERAL GRAND JURY???? where is the conspiracy...there is no answer to your question because it makes no sense. that was the best intelligence we had at the time and plenty of your left wing cronies signed on. bottom line ...no lie occurred and its academic anyway because this is jihad not saddam..with al qaeda....\\\
wow another liberal in need of a fact checker...NEXT!!!
2007-01-28 20:54:01 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
EXPOSING LIBERALS
CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS GIVE WAY MORE TO THE NEEDY THAN LIBERAL DEMOCRATS-- EVEN AFTER YOU REMOVE RELIGIOUS TITHINGS.
Liberals just want to redistribute income in the name of their ultimate goal--communism. Liberals are ALL TALK, NO ACTION. Conservative Republicans are compassionate. Liberal Democrats are selfish.
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682... (ABC News Study)
http://www.arthurbrooks.net/excerpt.html... (Syracuse University Study)
YAHOO COMMIES KEEP TRYING TO STOP THE LINKS:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730&page=1
http://www.arthurbrooks.net/excerpt.html
2007-01-28 20:53:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
your bus is not the only thing that is short.
2007-01-28 20:52:01 · answer #9 · answered by 007 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋